IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/gluwps/302301.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Informal work and how to measure it: A formal consensus at the 100th International Conference of Labour Statisticians

Author

Listed:
  • Belchamber, Grant
  • Schetagne, Sylvain

Abstract

Over the past fifty years, interest in and analysis of informality at work has burgeoned. Informal employment, including but not limited to un-declared work, is a core concern for unions worldwide. In 2019, nearly 2 billion workers (about 6 in every 10) were in informal employment. Informal employment is found in all countries, but its prevalence is inversely proportional to income being highest in low income countries at around 90 per cent of total employment, and lowest in high-income countries at less than 20 per cent of total employment. The share of women in informal employment exceeds that of men in most countries.1 Statistics on informal employment are vital for describing the structure and extent of informal employment. They are essential to identify groups of persons in employment most represented and at risk of informality, and to provide information on exposure to economic and personal risks, decent work deficits and working conditions. For unionists and policy makers, there is a need to measure the prevalence of informality across jobs, economic units and activities; the distribution of informal and formal jobs by socio-demographic characteristics; the percentage of persons with informal main jobs in the informal and formal sectors; levels of protection for those in informal and formal employment; and contextual vulnerabilities, including poverty, inequalities, discrimination, access to land and natural resources, household composition, access to social protection. These data provide the evidentiary base to push for and implement policies that can improve the working lives of those in informal employment. (...)

Suggested Citation

  • Belchamber, Grant & Schetagne, Sylvain, 2024. "Informal work and how to measure it: A formal consensus at the 100th International Conference of Labour Statisticians," GLU Working Papers 61, Global Labour University (GLU).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:gluwps:302301
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/302301/1/GLU-WP-61.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:gluwps:302301. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://global-labour-university.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.