IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/300229.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Wie bedingen sich Rechenschaftslegung und organisationales Lernen in der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit?

Author

Listed:
  • Esser, Daniel E.
  • Janus, Heiner

Abstract

Wie bedingen sich Rechenschaftslegung und organisationales Lernen im weltweit zweitgrößten bilateralen System der Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (EZ)? Wir analysieren Interviewdaten von Mitarbeitenden der beiden deutschen größten EZ-Durchführungsorganisationen: der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) und der Entwicklungsbank der Kreditanstalt für Wiederaufbau (KfW). Für unsere Analyse verwenden wir Goffmans Heuristik der 'Bühne', um soziale Praktiken in beiden Organisationen zu erforschen. Unseren Daten zufolge bewegen sich Interviewte in zwei verschiedenen metaphorischen Räumen: einer Vorder- und einer Hinterbühne. Die deutsche Ministerialbürokratie stellt für sie ein Publikum dar, das - den chaotischen Realitäten der EZ zum Trotz - eine stimmige Aufführung erwartet. Die Befragten schildern daraufhin organisationale Inszenierungen auf einer Vorderbühne mit dem Ziel, äußere Eindrücke zu managen. Die organisationale Hinterbühne wird hingegen zur Wahrung größtmöglicher Autonomie abgeschirmt. Im Ergebnis sind Rechenschaftslegung und organisationales Lernen im deutschen Fall entkoppelt. Wir verbinden diese Erkenntnis mit der hierarchischen, marktfernen Struktur des deutschen EZ-Systems, der Bedeutung organisationaler Eigeninteressen sowie einer kollektiven beruflichen Norm, gemäß derer der Fortbestand der EZ nicht gefährdet werden darf.

Suggested Citation

  • Esser, Daniel E. & Janus, Heiner, 2024. "Wie bedingen sich Rechenschaftslegung und organisationales Lernen in der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit?," IDOS Discussion Papers 7/2024, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:300229
    DOI: 10.23661/idp7.2024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/300229/1/1892065045.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.23661/idp7.2024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Asif Mohammad Shahan & Ferdous Jahan & Rizwan Khair, 2021. "A glimpse of light in darkness: Performance‐based accountability in Bangladesh public administration," Public Administration & Development, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 41(4), pages 191-202, October.
    2. Hoey, Lesli, 2015. "“Show me the Numbers”: Examining the Dynamics Between Evaluation and Government Performance in Developing Countries," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 1-12.
    3. repec:bla:devpol:v:23:y:2005:i:6:p:643-663 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Honig, Dan, 2019. "When Reporting Undermines Performance: The Costs of Politically Constrained Organizational Autonomy in Foreign Aid Implementation," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 73(1), pages 171-201, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mirko Heinzel, 2023. "Vytautas Jankauskas and Steffen Eckhard. 2023. The Politics of Evaluation in International Organizations (Oxford: Oxford University Press)," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 777-781, October.
    2. Blesh, Jennifer & Hoey, Lesli & Jones, Andrew D. & Friedmann, Harriet & Perfecto, Ivette, 2019. "Development pathways toward “zero hunger”," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-14.
    3. Bernhard Reinsberg & Christian Siauwijaya, 2024. "Does earmarked funding affect the performance of international organisations?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 15(1), pages 23-39, February.
    4. Mirko Heinzel & Andrea Liese, 2021. "Managing performance and winning trust: how World Bank staff shape recipient performance," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 625-653, July.
    5. Weinlich, Silke & Baumann, Max-Otto & Lundsgaarde, Erik & Wolff, Peter, 2020. "Earmarking in the multilateral development system: Many shades of grey," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 101, number 101, July.
    6. Silvia Marchesi & Tania Masi, 2021. "Delegation of implementation in project aid," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 655-687, July.
    7. Springer, Emily, 2021. "Caught between winning repeat business and learning: Reactivity to output indicators in international development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    8. Steffen Eckhard & Vytautas Jankauskas & Elena Leuschner & Ian Burton & Tilman Kerl & Rita Sevastjanova, 2023. "The performance of international organizations: a new measure and dataset based on computational text analysis of evaluation reports," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 18(4), pages 753-776, October.
    9. Jaehee Hwang & Jonghoon Park & Seongwoo Lee, 2018. "The Impact of the Comprehensive Rural Village Development Program on Rural Sustainability in Korea," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-21, July.
    10. Heinzel, Mirko & Reinsberg, Bernhard, 2024. "Trust funds and the sub-national effectiveness of development aid: Evidence from the World Bank," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    11. Ryan C. Briggs, 2020. "Results from single-donor analyses of project aid success seem to generalize pretty well across donors," The Review of International Organizations, Springer, vol. 15(4), pages 947-963, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Wirksamkeit; Evaluierung; Monitoring; Indikatoren; politische Ökonomie; Rechenschaftspflicht; Lernen;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:300229. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.