IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/182017.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The G20 and the “Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project”

Author

Listed:
  • Picciotto, Sol
  • Gallardo, Agustina
  • Kadet, Jeffrey
  • Henn, Markus
  • Villanueva, Maria

Abstract

This report provides a survey and analysis of the efforts to reform the rules on international corporate taxation under the project on base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). This was launched in 2012 by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and supported in 2013 by the G20 world leaders, adding participation in the work by non-OECD G20 countries, and subsequently some developing countries. The main outputs were delivered in October 2015, but key aspects are continuing, and all states have been invited to join the Inclusive Forum on BEPS. The report begins with an overview of the legal and institutional arrangements for international coordination of corporate taxation, which date back to the League of Nations in the 1920s. It traces the interaction between the political concerns about taxation of multinational enterprises (MNEs) and the work of technical specialists, especially since the involvement of the G7 leaders from the mid-1990s, and then the G20 following the great financial crash. It analyses the flaws in international tax rules which led to concerns about double non-taxation and the techniques of tax avoidance which resulted in ‘stateless income’. The main sections explain clearly and succinctly the measures put forward in the BEPS project reports, and assess their likely effects in attempting to solve the problem of BEPS. It discusses the challenges of implementation of the proposals, as well as the continuing agenda. It closes with an evaluation of the challenges for global tax governance, and discusses the contributions of the various actors involved in trying to meet them.

Suggested Citation

  • Picciotto, Sol & Gallardo, Agustina & Kadet, Jeffrey & Henn, Markus & Villanueva, Maria, 2017. "The G20 and the “Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS) Project”," IDOS Discussion Papers 18/2017, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:182017
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199508/1/die-dp-2017-18.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. repec:idq:ictduk:11206 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Working Group of the Economic and Financial Committee, 2000. "Report on financial stability," European Economy - Economic Papers 2008 - 2015 143, Directorate General Economic and Financial Affairs (DG ECFIN), European Commission.
    3. Lisa Evers & Helen Miller & Christoph Spengel, 2015. "Intellectual property box regimes: effective tax rates and tax policy considerations," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 22(3), pages 502-530, June.
    4. Hearson, Martin, 2016. "Measuring tax treaty negotiation outcomes: the Actionaid tax treaties dataset," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 67869, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    5. Michael Devereux & Rita de la Feria, 2014. "Designing and Implementing a Destination-Based Corporate Tax," Working Papers 1407, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
    6. repec:idq:ictduk:12801 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Axel Prettl & Dominik Hagen, 2023. "Multinational ownership patterns and anti-tax avoidance legislation," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 30(3), pages 565-634, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fabien Candau & Jacques Le Cacheux, 2017. "Corporate Income Tax as a Genuine own Resource," Working papers of CATT hal-01847937, HAL.
    2. Lisa Evers & Helen Miller & Christoph Spengel, 2015. "Intellectual property box regimes: effective tax rates and tax policy considerations," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 22(3), pages 502-530, June.
    3. Uyar, Ali & Bani-Mustafa, Ahmed & Nimer, Khalil & Schneider, Friedrich & Hasnaoui, Amir, 2021. "Does innovation capacity reduce tax evasion? Moderating effect of intellectual property rights," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    4. Jorg Bibow, 2015. "The Euro's Savior? Assessing the ECB's Crisis Management Performance and Potential for Crisis Resolution," Economics Working Paper Archive wp_845, Levy Economics Institute.
    5. Holzmann, Carolin & Büttner, Thiess, 2018. "Switching to Territorial Taxation: FDI Effects for Host-Countries of Foreign Subsidiaries," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181555, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    6. Ben Klemens, 2021. "Attributing Value to Patents and Trademarks in Complex Production Chains," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 842-875, June.
    7. Spengel, Christoph & Heckemeyer, Jost Henrich & Streif, Frank, 2016. "The effect of inflation and interest rates on forward-looking effective tax rates," ZEW Expertises, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research, volume 63, number 148154, March.
    8. Spengel, Christoph & Fischer, Leonie & Stutzenberger, Kathrin, 2020. "Breaking borders? The European Court of Justice and internal market," ZEW Discussion Papers 20-059, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Sijbren Cnossen, 2016. "Tackling Spillovers by Taxing Corporate Income in the European Union at Source," CPB Discussion Paper 324, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    10. Mark Vancauteren & Michael Polder & Marcel van den Berg, 2019. "The Relationship between Tax Payments and MNE’s Patenting Activities and Implications for Real Economic Activity: Evidence from the Netherlands," NBER Chapters, in: Challenges of Globalization in the Measurement of National Accounts, pages 237-269, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    11. Schwab, Thomas & Todtenhaupt, Maximilian, 2016. "Spillover from the haven: Cross-border externalities of patent box regimes within multinational firms," ZEW Discussion Papers 16-073, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Shin, Hyun Song, 2008. "Risk and liquidity in a system context," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 315-329, July.
    13. Christof Ernst & Katharina Richter & Nadine Riedel, 2014. "Corporate taxation and the quality of research and development," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 21(4), pages 694-719, August.
    14. Sandro Montresor & Francesco Quatraro, 2015. "Key Enabling Technologies and Smart Specialization Strategies. European Regional Evidence from patent data," JRC Working Papers on Corporate R&D and Innovation 2015-05, Joint Research Centre.
    15. Dudar, Olena & Spengel, Christoph & Voget, Johannes, 2015. "The impact of taxes on bilateral royalty flows," ZEW Discussion Papers 15-052, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    16. Ben Klemens, 2017. "Intellectual Property Boxes and the Paradox of Price Discrimination," Working Papers 1703, Council on Economic Policies.
    17. Ocampo, José Antonio, 2001. "International asymmetries and the design of the International Financial System," Series Históricas 7776, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    18. Irina Dezhina & Tamam Nafikova & Timur Gareev & Alexey Ponomarev, 2020. "Tax Incentives for Supporting Competitiveness of Telecommunication Manufacturers," Foresight and STI Governance (Foresight-Russia till No. 3/2015), National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 14(2), pages 51-62.
    19. İrem Güçeri & Marko Köthenbürger & Martin Simmler, 2020. "Supporting Firm Innovation and R&D: What is the Optimal Policy Mix?," EconPol Policy Reports 20, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich.
    20. Sebastien Bradley & Estelle Dauchy & Leslie Robinson, 2015. "Cross-Country Evidence on the Preliminary Effects of Patent Box Regimes on Patent Activity and Ownership," National Tax Journal, National Tax Association;National Tax Journal, vol. 68(4), pages 1047-1072, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:182017. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.