IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diedps/162014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Bureaucratic pluralism in global development: challenges for Germany and the United States

Author

Listed:
  • Lundsgaarde, Erik

Abstract

A variety of governmental actors within OECD-DAC donor countries oversee funding distributed to developing countries. This paper examines the role of diverse bureaucracies within the development policy systems of Germany and the United States and highlights core questions that their international engagement presents for the future of development cooperation. The paper reviews trends in funding across bureaucracies over the last decade, provides an overview of existing mechanisms for enhancing cross-governmental consistency and analyses proposals to reform the organisational set-up of the two systems. Although the challenges presented by sector-specific bureaucracies vary across donor contexts and within particular sectors of engagement, their presence in the cooperation landscape clearly creates pressure on foreign affairs and development bureaucracies to redefine their roles in the management of international cooperation. In preparing for future challenges, these bureaucratic actors will need to clearly articulate their own geographical, thematic and coordination competences in order to determine how the expertise and other resources from varied governmental actors can be effectively combined.

Suggested Citation

  • Lundsgaarde, Erik, 2014. "Bureaucratic pluralism in global development: challenges for Germany and the United States," IDOS Discussion Papers 16/2014, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:162014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/199429/1/die-dp-2014-16.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Henökl, Thomas, 2016. "Comparing structure and organisation of development bureaucracies in Europe: a pilot study of European aid administrations," IDOS Discussion Papers 27/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
    2. Weinlich, Silke & Baumann, Max-Otto & Lundsgaarde, Erik & Wolff, Peter, 2020. "Earmarking in the multilateral development system: Many shades of grey," IDOS Studies, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS), volume 101, number 101, July.
    3. Scholz, Imme & Keijzer, Niels & Richerzhagen, Carmen, 2016. "Promoting the Sustainable Development Goals in Germany," IDOS Discussion Papers 13/2016, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diedps:162014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.