Author
Listed:
- Berger, Axel
- Gsell, Sebastian
- Olekseyuk, Zoryana
Abstract
While global investment needs are enormous in order to bolster the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, developing countries are often excluded from global foreign direct investment (FDI) flows. Beyond economic fundamentals like market size, infra¬structure and labour, the impediments to FDI in developing countries relate to the predictability, transparency and ease of the regulatory environment. In contrast, tax incentives and international investment agreements (IIAs) have been found to be less important (World Bank, 2018). To harness the advantages of FDI, it is critical that governments have policies and regulations in place that help to attract and retain FDI and enhance its contribution to sustainable development. The 2030 Agenda and the Addis Ababa Action Agenda, thus, call for appropriate international frameworks to support investments in developing countries. In this context, the Joint Ministerial Statement on Investment Facilitation for Development adopted at the 11th Ministerial Conference of the World Trade Organization (WTO) in December 2017 called for the start of “structured discussions with the aim of developing a multilateral framework on investment facilitation”. Investment facilitation refers to a set of practical measures concerned with improving the transparency and predict¬ability of investment frameworks, streamlining procedures related to foreign investors, and enhancing coordination and cooperation between stakeholders, such as host and home country government, foreign investors and domestic corporations, as well as societal actors. Despite the deadlock in the WTO’s 17-year-old Doha Round negotiations, the structured discussions on investment facilitation, which have been under way since March 2018, show that the members of the WTO take a strong interest in using the WTO as a platform to negotiate new international rules at the interface of trade and investment. In contrast to previous attempts by developed countries to establish multilateral rules for investment, the structured discussions are mainly driven by emerging and developing countries. Most of them have evolved over the past years into FDI host and home countries reflecting the changing geography of economic power in the world. Their increased role has led to a shift of policy agendas, focusing on practical measures to promote FDI in developing countries while excluding contentious issues such as investment liberali¬sation and protection, and investor–state dispute settlement (ISDS). This policy brief provides an overview of the emerging policy debate about investment facilitation. We highlight that four key challenges need to be tackled in order to negotiate an investment facilitation framework (IFF) in the WTO that supports sustainable development: There is a need to properly conceptualise the scope of investment facilitation as a basis for empirical analyses of the potential impact of a multilateral IFF. Many less- and least-developed countries do not yet participate in the structured discussions. It is necessary to enhance their capacity to participate in the structured discussions and address their specific concerns. In order to enhance the contribution of FDI to sustainable development it is necessary to support the development of governance mechanisms at the domestic level. It is key to ensure transparency towards countries not yet participating in the discussions, the business sector and societal actors to support a successful policy process.
Suggested Citation
Berger, Axel & Gsell, Sebastian & Olekseyuk, Zoryana, 2019.
"Investment facilitation for development: a new route to global investment governance,"
Briefing Papers
5/2019, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
Handle:
RePEc:zbw:diebps:52019
DOI: 10.23661/bp5.2019
Download full text from publisher
Citations
Citations are extracted by the
CitEc Project, subscribe to its
RSS feed for this item.
Cited by:
- Berger, Axel & Dadkhah, Ali & Olekseyuk, Zoryana, 2021.
"Quantifying investment facilitation at country level: Introducing a new index,"
IDOS Discussion Papers
23/2021, German Institute of Development and Sustainability (IDOS).
- Berger, Axel & Dadkhah, Ali & Olekseyuk, Zoryana, 2019.
"Potential Investment Facilitation Agreement: Possible Scenarios and Their Impact on Countries’ Regulations,"
Conference papers
333069, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
- Berger, Axel & Dadkhah, Ali & Olekseyuk, Zoryana, 2019.
"Potential Investment Facilitation Agreement: Possible Scenarios and Their Impact on Countries’ Regulations,"
Conference papers
333076, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diebps:52019. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ditubde.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.