IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/diceop/23.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Sind Moscheen in Deutschland NIMBY-Güter?

Author

Listed:
  • Haucap, Justus
  • Heimeshoff, Ulrich

Abstract

Der Bau von Moscheen in deutschen Großstädten ist in Öffentlichkeit und in Medien in den letzten Jahren sehr kontrovers und teilweise heftig diskutiert werden. Bereits die Ankündigung einer geplanten Errichtung einer großen Moschee hat zu teilweise grotesk anmutenden Abwehrreaktionen geführt. Was genau auch immer die ablehnende Haltung mancher Bürger zum Moscheebau in ihrer Stadt oder in der Nachbarschaft im Einzelnen begründet, ist nicht Gegenstand dieses Beitrags. Vielmehr wird analysiert, ob Moscheen in Deutschland womöglich ein Beispiel für ein sogenanntes NIMBY-Gut sind, wobei NIMBY für Not In My Backyard steht. Mit NIMBY-Gütern werden in der ökonomischen Fachliteratur solche Güter bezeichnet, deren Existenz grundsätzlich von der Mehrheit der Bürger als sinnvoll angesehen wird, aber die man dennoch nicht gerne in seiner unmittelbaren Nachbarschaft haben möchte. Solche NIMBY-Güter stellen für Bürger und wirtschaftspolitische Entscheidungsträger ein schwierig zu handhabendes Problem dar. Unsere Analyse ist ein erster Schritt zur Quantifizierung der tatsächlichen Auswirkungen des Moscheebaus auf die Immobilienpreise in der umliegenden Nachbarschaft. Ein erstes vorsichtiges Fazit lautet, dass sich die Folgen für die betroffenen Nachbarn im Durchschnitt in Grenzen halten, auch wenn die Situation im Einzelfall anders gelagert sein kann. Mit Hilfe einer eher kleinen Stichprobe können zwar keine robusten wirtschaftspolitischen Empfehlungen abgeleitet werden - es ist aber festzuhalten, dass die Analyse keine Hinweise auf gravierende Einflüsse auf die Immobilienpreise in der Nachbarschaft liefert.

Suggested Citation

  • Haucap, Justus & Heimeshoff, Ulrich, 2012. "Sind Moscheen in Deutschland NIMBY-Güter?," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 23, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:diceop:23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/54760/1/683354205.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    2. Gruber, Harald & Verboven, Frank, 2001. "The diffusion of mobile telecommunications services in the European Union," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 45(3), pages 577-588, March.
    3. Theresia Theurl, 2010. "Wirtschaftspolitische Konsequenzen der Finanz- und Wirtschaftskrise," Schriften des Vereins für Socialpolitik, Duncker & Humblot GmbH, Berlin, edition 1, volume 127, number 53440.
    4. Werner W. Pommerehne & Lars P. Feld & Albert Hart, 1994. "Voluntary Provision of a Public Good: Results from a Real World Experiment," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 505-518, November.
    5. Frank M. Bass, 1969. "A New Product Growth for Model Consumer Durables," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 15(5), pages 215-227, January.
    6. Anwar Hussain & David Laband, 2005. "The tragedy of the political commons: Evidence from U.S. Senate roll call votes on environmental legislation," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 353-364, September.
    7. In Kwon Park & Burkhard von Rabenau, 2011. "Disentangling Agglomeration Economies: Agents, Sources, And Spatial Dependence," Journal of Regional Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(5), pages 897-930, December.
    8. Davies, Stephen W., 1979. "Inter-firm diffusion of process innovations," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 299-317, October.
    9. repec:bla:kyklos:v:47:y:1994:i:4:p:505-18 is not listed on IDEAS
    10. Frey, Bruno S & Oberholzer-Gee, Felix & Eichenberger, Reiner, 1996. "The Old Lady Visits Your Backyard: A Tale of Morals and Markets," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 104(6), pages 1297-1313, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Coenen, Michael & Haucap, Justus, 2013. "Kommunal- statt Missbrauchsaufsicht: Zur Aufsicht über Trinkwasserentgelte nach der 8. GWB-Novelle," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 53, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Emanuele Giovannetti & Mohsen Hamoudia, 2022. "The interaction between direct and indirect network externalities in the early diffusion of mobile social networking," Eurasian Business Review, Springer;Eurasia Business and Economics Society, vol. 12(4), pages 617-642, December.
    2. Gauguier, Jean-Jacques, 2009. "L’industrialisation de l’Open Source," Economics Thesis from University Paris Dauphine, Paris Dauphine University, number 123456789/4388 edited by Toledano, Joëlle.
    3. Ben Klemens, 2021. "Attributing Value to Patents and Trademarks in Complex Production Chains," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 842-875, June.
    4. Al-Alawi, Baha M. & Bradley, Thomas H., 2013. "Review of hybrid, plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle market modeling Studies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 190-203.
    5. Peters, Kay & Albers, Sönke & Kumar, V., 2008. "Is there more to international Diffusion than Culture? An investigation on the Role of Marketing and Industry Variables," EconStor Preprints 27678, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    6. Cantono, Simona, 2012. "Unveiling diffusion dynamics: an autocatalytic percolation model of environmental innovation diffusion and the optimal dynamic path of adoption subsidies," Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de Martiis LEI & BRICK - Laboratory of Economics of Innovation "Franco Momigliano", Bureau of Research in Innovation, Complexity and Knowledge, Collegio 201222, University of Turin.
    7. Jongsu Lee & Minkyu Lee, 2009. "Analysis on the growth of telecommunication services: a global comparison of diffusion patterns," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(24), pages 3143-3150.
    8. Geroski, P. A., 2000. "Models of technology diffusion," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 29(4-5), pages 603-625, April.
    9. Paolo Zeppini & Koen Frenken, 2015. "Networks, Percolation, and Demand," Department of Economics Working Papers 38/15, University of Bath, Department of Economics.
    10. Swinerd, Chris & McNaught, Ken R., 2015. "Comparing a simulation model with various analytic models of the international diffusion of consumer technology," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 330-343.
    11. Marc Dijk & René Kemp & Pieter Valkering, 2013. "Incorporating social context and co-evolution in an innovation diffusion model—with an application to cleaner vehicles," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 295-329, April.
    12. Mira Frick & Yuhta Ishii, 2015. "Innovation Adoption by Forward-Looking Social Learners," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 1877, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    13. Frank, Lauri Dieter, 2002. "A spatial model of the diffusion of mobile communications within the European Union," ERSA conference papers ersa02p161, European Regional Science Association.
    14. Ivan Diaz-Rainey, 2010. "Modelling international wind energy diffusion: Are the patterns of induced diffusion S shaped?," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2010-07, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    15. Ivan Diaz-Rainey & Dionisia Tzavara, 2011. "Financing Renewable Energy through Household Adoption of Green Electricity Tariffs: A Diffusion Model of an Induced Environmental Market," Working Paper series, University of East Anglia, Centre for Competition Policy (CCP) 2011-03, Centre for Competition Policy, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK..
    16. Stühmeier, Torben, 2011. "Das Leistungsschutzrecht für Presseverleger: Eine ordnungspolitische Analyse," DICE Ordnungspolitische Perspektiven 12, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf Institute for Competition Economics (DICE).
    17. Hall, Bronwyn H. & Khan, Beethika, 2003. "Adoption of New Technology," Department of Economics, Working Paper Series qt3wg4p528, Department of Economics, Institute for Business and Economic Research, UC Berkeley.
    18. Lauri Frank, 2003. "Inequality Measures Applied to the Diffusion of Mobile Communications within the European Union," ERSA conference papers ersa03p516, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Gupta, Ruchita & Jain, Karuna, 2016. "Competition effect of a new mobile technology on an incumbent technology: An Indian case study," Telecommunications Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(4), pages 332-342.
    20. Karshenas, Massoud & Stoneman, Paul, 1990. "The Role of Exogenous and Endogenous Learning and Economic Factors in the diffusion of New Technology: An Epidemic Based Study of the Spread of Colour Television Ownership in the UK," Economic Research Papers 268391, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:diceop:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/diduede.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.