IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/colfdi/182.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Philip Morris vs. tobacco control: two wins for public health, but uncertainty remains

Author

Listed:
  • Voon, Tania
  • Mitchell, Andrew D.

Abstract

Two investment treaty claims launched by Philip Morris entities against tobacco control measures implemented by Australia and Uruguay have ended, with Philip Morris losing both disputes. This Perspective highlights these positive results from a public health viewpoint while emphasizing the continued need for reform of the investment regime.

Suggested Citation

  • Voon, Tania & Mitchell, Andrew D., 2016. "Philip Morris vs. tobacco control: two wins for public health, but uncertainty remains," Columbia FDI Perspectives 182, Columbia University, Columbia Center on Sustainable Investment (CCSI).
    • Handle: RePEc:zbw:colfdi:182
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/254016/1/fdi-perspectives-no182.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anne Marie Thow & Wolfgang Alschner & Faisal Aljunied, 2023. "Public health clauses in international investment agreements: Sword or shield?," Global Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 14(2), pages 260-269, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:colfdi:182. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/vicolus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.