IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/zbw/arqudp/207.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Relevanz der deutschen Zinsschranke für Personenunternehmen: Eine dynamische Analyse der Betroffenheit

Author

Listed:
  • Alberternst, Stephan

Abstract

Empirische Untersuchungen zur Relevanz der Zinsschranke betrachten in der Regel lediglich Kapitalgesellschaften und bilden somit nur einen Bruchteil der potentiell betroffenen Unternehmen ab. Auf Basis eines umfangreichen balancierten Panels analysiere ich anhand von handelsrechtlichen Jahresabschlussdaten den Einfluss der Zinsschranke auf Personenunternehmen. In Abhängigkeit vom jeweiligen Jahr sind im Zeitraum von 2008 bis 2012 zwischen 64 (2,9%) und 73 (3,3%) Personenunternehmen in der Stichprobe potentiell von der Zinsschranke betroffen. Die balancierte Panelstruktur liefert zudem Hinweise darauf, dass ein erheblicher Teil der Personenunternehmen, die zumindest in einem Jahr betroffen sind, dieses auch über einen langen Zeitraum bleiben (49,53%). Die Zins- und EBITDA-Vorträge steigen im Zeitablauf nahezu linear pro betroffenem Personenunternehmen an, führen jedoch nicht, wie politisch beabsichtigt, zu einer langfristigen Reduzierung der Anzahl der betroffenen Unternehmen. Zudem weisen von der Zinsschranke betroffene Personenunternehmen signifikant höhere Fremdkapitalquoten auf, sind weniger rentabel und größer als die nicht betroffenen Personenunternehmen. Ebenso ist zu erkennen, dass die betroffenen Gesellschaften eine höhere Sicherheitenquote, ein höheres Insolvenzrisiko, eine niedrigere Liquidität und ein niedrigeres Innenfinanzierungsvolumen sowie ein höheres operatives Risiko aufweisen. Darüber hinaus deutet ein Vergleich der betroffenen Personenunternehmen mit den betroffenen Kapitalgesellschaften darauf hin, dass die Kapitalgesellschaften sich in einer wirtschaftlich schlechteren Situation als die entsprechenden Personenunternehmen befinden. Unter Verwendung eines Propensity Score Matchings kann für Personenunternehmen der vermutete Zusammenhang, dass betroffene Personenunternehmen ihre Fremdkapitalquote stärker reduzieren als nicht betroffene Personenunternehmen und ebenso der Einfluss von Liquiditätsproblemen, nicht auf einem statistisch signifikanten Niveau gezeigt werden.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberternst, Stephan, 2016. "Relevanz der deutschen Zinsschranke für Personenunternehmen: Eine dynamische Analyse der Betroffenheit," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 207, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:arqudp:207
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/141830/1/860012832.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Shuping & Chen, Xia & Cheng, Qiang & Shevlin, Terry, 2010. "Are family firms more tax aggressive than non-family firms?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 95(1), pages 41-61, January.
    2. Edward I. Altman, 2013. "Predicting financial distress of companies: revisiting the Z-Score and ZETA® models," Chapters, in: Adrian R. Bell & Chris Brooks & Marcel Prokopczuk (ed.), Handbook of Research Methods and Applications in Empirical Finance, chapter 17, pages 428-456, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    3. Dreßler, Daniel & Scheuering, Uwe, 2012. "Empirical evaluation of interest barrier effects," ZEW Discussion Papers 12-046, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    4. Michael Broer, 2009. "Ziele, Wirkungsweise und Steueraufkommen der neuen Zinsschranke," Schmollers Jahrbuch : Journal of Applied Social Science Studies / Zeitschrift für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften, Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, vol. 129(3), pages 391-413.
    5. Michael Overesch & Georg Wamser, 2010. "Corporate tax planning and thin-capitalization rules: evidence from a quasi-experiment," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(5), pages 563-573.
    6. Buettner, Thiess & Overesch, Michael & Schreiber, Ulrich & Wamser, Georg, 2012. "The impact of thin-capitalization rules on the capital structure of multinational firms," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(11), pages 930-938.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alberternst, Stephan & Schwar, Torben, 2015. "Relevanz der Zinsschranke: Eine empirische Untersuchung der betroffenen Unternehmen von 2008 bis 2012," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 200, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    2. Zarko Y. Kalamov, 2020. "Safe haven or earnings stripping rules: a prisoner’s dilemma?," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 27(1), pages 38-76, February.
    3. Mardan, Mohammed, 2017. "Why countries differ in thin capitalization rules: The role of financial development," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 1-14.
    4. Nicolay, Katharina & Nusser, Hannah & Pfeiffer, Olena, 2017. "On the interdependency of profit shifting channels and the effectiveness of anti-avoidance legislation," ZEW Discussion Papers 17-066, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Ruf Martin & Schindler Dirk, 2015. "Debt Shifting and Thin-Capitalization Rules – German Experience and Alternative Approaches," Nordic Tax Journal, Sciendo, vol. 2015(1), pages 17-33, September.
    6. Kalamov, Zarko Y., 2015. "Safe Haven vs. Earnings Stripping Rules: a Prisoner Dilemma?," EconStor Preprints 110895, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    7. Jennifer Blouin & Harry Huizinga & Luc Laeven & Gaëtan Nicodème, 2013. "Thin capitalization rules and multinational firm capital structure," Working Papers 1323, Oxford University Centre for Business Taxation.
    8. Harju, Jarkko & Kauppinen, Ilpo & Ropponen, Olli, 2017. "Firm Responses to an Interest Barrier: Empirical Evidence," Working Papers 90, VATT Institute for Economic Research.
    9. Georg Wamser, 2014. "The Impact of Thin-Capitalization Rules on External Debt Usage – A Propensity Score Matching Approach," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 76(5), pages 764-781, October.
    10. Andreas Haufler & Mohammed Mardan & Dirk Schindler, 2016. "Optimal Policies against Profit Shifting: The Role of Controlled-Foreign-Company Rules," CESifo Working Paper Series 5850, CESifo.
    11. Gschossmann, Emilia & Heckemeyer, Jost H. & Müller, Jessica & Spengel, Christoph & Spix, Julia & Wickel, Sophia, 2024. "The EU's new era of "Fair Company Taxation": The impact of DEBRA and Pillar Two on the EU Member States' effective tax rates," ZEW Discussion Papers 24-014, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    12. Thiess Buettner & Michael Overesch & Georg Wamser, 2018. "Anti profit-shifting rules and foreign direct investment," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 25(3), pages 553-580, June.
    13. Dreßler, Daniel & Scheuering, Uwe, 2012. "Empirical evaluation of interest barrier effects," ZEW Discussion Papers 12-046, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    14. Mardan, Mohammed & Haufler, Andreas & Schindler, Dirk, 2014. "An Economic Rationale for Controlled-Foreign-Corporation Rules," VfS Annual Conference 2014 (Hamburg): Evidence-based Economic Policy 100405, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    15. Egger, Peter H. & Wamser, Georg, 2015. "The impact of controlled foreign company legislation on real investments abroad. A multi-dimensional regression discontinuity design," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 77-91.
    16. Brandstetter, Laura, 2014. "Do corporate tax cuts reduce international profit shifting," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 162, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    17. Ropponen, Olli, 2021. "Interest Limitation Rules and Business Cycles: Empirical Evidence," ETLA Working Papers 90, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    18. Alberternst, Stephan & Sureth-Sloane, Caren, 2016. "Interest barrier and capital structure response," arqus Discussion Papers in Quantitative Tax Research 206, arqus - Arbeitskreis Quantitative Steuerlehre.
    19. Overesch Michael, 2016. "Steuervermeidung multinationaler Unternehmen: Die Befunde der empirischen Forschung," Perspektiven der Wirtschaftspolitik, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 129-143, July.
    20. Michael Overesch & Georg Wamser, 2014. "Bilateral internal debt financing and tax planning of multinational firms," Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 191-209, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Finanzierungsentscheidungen; deutsche Steuerreform; Zinsschranke; Fremdkapitalquote; Besteuerung; Unterfinanzierungsregelungen;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • F34 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - International Lending and Debt Problems
    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:arqudp:207. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.arqus.info/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.