IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ysm/somwrk/ysm438.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Economic Analysis of Life Care

Author

Listed:
  • Jonathan S. Feinstein

    (School of Management)

  • Edward Keating

    (Santa Monica CA Offices)

Abstract

Life care communities offer long term care to the elderly in the context of a residential community. Residents move into a life care community while still relatively young (though typically past age 65), initially occupying an independent living unit situated in a living complex similar to a retirement community. Later, when a resident requires more intensive care, she moves to an on-site nursing facility. In this paper we present an economic analysis of the life care industry. Our model includes a detailed specification of elderly couples' utility, a description of elderly morbidity and mortality experiences, and a formulation of the life care contract. Our results suggest that life care can offer considerable benefits to the elderly; in particular, we calculate that - based on the contractual terms which will be offered by a profit-maximizing life care operator - moving into a life care facility provides an elderly couple of age 65 with an expected surplus of $20,000 to $80,000 as compared with the alternative of remaining in their own home and utilizing (when necessary) a stand-alone nursing home. We also show that introducing into the model the risk of operator bankruptcy, which historically has been significant, substantially alters the equilibrium life care contract, and generates contractual terms which are quite close to those observed in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Jonathan S. Feinstein & Edward Keating, 2003. "An Economic Analysis of Life Care," Yale School of Management Working Papers ysm438, Yale School of Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:ysm:somwrk:ysm438
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=467680
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Capitalization; Local Public Goods; School Quality; Discrete Choice Models; Hedonic Price Regression; Education Demand;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ysm:somwrk:ysm438. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/smyalus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.