IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wpa/wuwpot/0207004.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Single-desk marketing: assessing the economic arguments

Author

Listed:
  • Lisa Gropp

    (Productivity Commission)

  • Tom Hallam

    (Productivity Commission)

  • Vince Manion

    (Productivity Commission)

Abstract

Single-Desk Marketing: Assessing the Economic Arguments identifies the potential benefits and costs and the strengths and weakness of various arguments in favour of current single-desk arrangements. It does not attempt to quantify the costs and benefits of arrangements in any particular industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Lisa Gropp & Tom Hallam & Vince Manion, 2002. "Single-desk marketing: assessing the economic arguments," Others 0207004, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    • Handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0207004
    Note: Type of Document - Word 97; prepared on IPM PC; to print on HP; pages: 96; figures: included
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de/econ-wp/othr/papers/0207/0207004.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    single-desk - marketing boards - deregulation - wheat - cotton - wine - citrus - National Competition Policy;

    JEL classification:

    • Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wpa:wuwpot:0207004. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: EconWPA (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://econwpa.ub.uni-muenchen.de .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.