IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/sprcdp/0086.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Changing Boundary Between Home and Market: Australian Trends in Outsourcing Domestic Labour

Author

Listed:
  • Michael Bittman
  • Gabrielle Meagher
  • George Matheson

Abstract

It is widely believed that domestic outsourcing is booming. Many believe the growth of market services is a response to increasing time pressures arising from new responsibilities in the paid workforce, and to an inflexible sexual division of labour at home. The interpretation of the consequences of the purported growth of domestic outsourcing has been both divided and extreme. Paid domestic services have been declared: (1) a thing of the pre-industrial past; (2) a victim of self-servicing; and (3) the last frontier in the continuing advance of the market in post-industrial society. Consequently, the alleged boom in outsourcing has been viewed either as the resurgence of a pre-modern form of the exploitation of labour (possibly based on race or ethnicity), heralding a deeper and more intractable form of social stratification, or as a future engine of opportunity. Unfortunately all this discussion has run ahead of the facts. Two areas of research are vital: one is the study of the demand for outsourced domestic goods and services, and the other is wide-ranging comparative study of labour relations in the domestic outsourcing industry. This paper addresses the first of these areas. It describes a study of trends in expenditure on domestic outsourcing, drawing on an analysis of Australian Household Expenditure Surveys between 1984 and 1993-94. This information is then interpreted in the light of our knowledge of trend in time use over the same period.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael Bittman & Gabrielle Meagher & George Matheson, 1998. "The Changing Boundary Between Home and Market: Australian Trends in Outsourcing Domestic Labour," Discussion Papers 0086, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    • Handle: RePEc:wop:sprcdp:0086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sprc.unsw.edu.au/dp/dp086.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Peter Saunders, 1994. "The Role, Value and Limitations of Poverty Research," Discussion Papers 0053, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Johnson & Guyonne Kalb, 2002. "Economic Analyses of Families: Existing Research Findings," Melbourne Institute Working Paper Series wp2002n27, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, The University of Melbourne.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter Saunders, 1997. "Developing Policy Planning and Research Capabilities in the Asia Pacific," Discussion Papers 0078, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    2. Bruce Bradbury, 1996. "Are the Low Income Self-employed Poor?," Discussion Papers 0073, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    3. Peter Saunders, 1995. "Improving Work Incentives in a Means-Tested Welfare System: The 1994 Australian Social Security Reforms," Discussion Papers 0056, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    4. Peter Saunders, 1997. "Poverty, Choice and Legitimacy," Discussion Papers 0076, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    5. Peter Saunders, 1993. "Economic Adjustment and Distributional Change: Income Inequality and Poverty in Australia in the Eighties," Discussion Papers 0047, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    6. Marilyn McHugh & Jane Millar, 1996. "Sole Mothers in Australia: Supporting Mothers to Seek Work," Discussion Papers 0071, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    7. Tony Eardley & George Matheson, 1999. "Australian Attitudes to Unemployment and Unemployed People," Discussion Papers 00102, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    8. Bruce Bradbury, 1992. "The Welfare Interpretation of Family Size Equivalence Scales," Discussion Papers 0037, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    9. Hannu Uusitalo, 1996. "Economic Crisis and Social Policy in Finland in the 1990s," Discussion Papers 0070, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    10. Marilyn McHugh, 1999. "The Costs of Children: Budget Standards Estimates and the Child Support Scheme," Discussion Papers 00103, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    11. Peter Whiteford, 1995. "The use of replacement rates in international comparisons of benefit systems," International Social Security Review, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 48(2), pages 3-30, April.
    12. Michael Fine, 1999. "The Responsibility for Child and Aged Care: Shaping Policies for the Future," Discussion Papers 00105, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    13. Michael Bittman & George Matheson, 1996. "'All Else Confusion': What Do Time Surveys Show About Changes in Gender Equity," Discussion Papers 0072, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    14. Melanie Henwood, 1999. "Home and Away: Reflections on Long-term Care in the UK and Australia," Discussion Papers 00101, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    15. Peter Saunders, 1998. "Defining Poverty and Identifying the Poor: Reflections on the Australian Experience," Discussion Papers 0084, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    16. Michael Fine, 1995. "The Changing Mix of Welfare in Health Care and Community Support Services," Discussion Papers 0061, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    17. Bjorn Hallerod, 1994. "A New Approach to the Direct Measurement of Consensual Poverty," Discussion Papers 0050, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    18. Peter Saunders, 1995. "A Challenge to Work and Welfare: Poverty in Australia in the 1990s," Discussion Papers 0064, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    19. Sheila Shaver, 1998. "Extension Admidst Retrenchment: Gender and Welfare State Restructuring in Australia and Sweden," Discussion Papers 0092, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.
    20. Sheila Shaver, 1996. "Liberalism, Gender and Social Policy," Discussion Papers 0068, University of New South Wales, Social Policy Research Centre.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:sprcdp:0086. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/spnswau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.