IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/nwuipr/96-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Single Mothers' Living Arrangements: The Effect of Household Composition on AFDC Participation

Author

Listed:
  • Rebecca A. London

Abstract

This paper examines the determinants of single mothersÕ living arrangements and their effect on mothersÕ AFDC participation. Using data from the 1990 Survey of Income and Program Participation, I estimate a two-stage instrumental variables model to account for the simultaneity of the living arrangement and AFDC participation decisions. Tabulations show that 62 percent of single mothers live independently, 16 percent live in the home of their parents, 12 percent cohabit with an unrelated man, and 11 percent share with others. High AFDC plus Food Stamp benefits increase the propensity of mothers to cohabit, and decrease their probability of living with parents or sharing with others, relative to living independently. Higher benefits also increase the probability of AFDC receipt. However, the resulting rise in the AFDC participation rate is not as pronounced once the policyÕs simultaneous effect on the distribution of living arrangements is taken into account. In addition, increasing the restrictiveness of state policies regarding co-residentsÕ contributions to shelter and household expenses has effects on both the distribution of living arrangements and the AFDC participation rate. Again, simulations show that the effects on AFDC participation are mediated by the shift in the distribution of living arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • Rebecca A. London, "undated". "Single Mothers' Living Arrangements: The Effect of Household Composition on AFDC Participation," IPR working papers 96-4, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
    • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.