IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/nwuipr/96-34.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

New Models for Struggle: Environmental Decision Making Through Consensus

Author

Listed:
  • David N. Pellow

Abstract

Recent research in environmental sociology indicates that environmental movement activists continue to engage in radical, disruptive, and adversarial tactics to achieve their goals. In this paper I propose that environmentalists are using a new form of protest, specifically consensus-based decision-making. This new form emerged in response to profound changes in the political economy and ecology that have taken place during the last three decades. Consensus-based environmental decision-making is one method these actors are employing to find ways to achieve cleaner ecosystems and socioeconomic stability. Although consensus-building among actors of vastly unequal resources would appear to challenge traditional adversarial models of decision-making, I argue that it does not. Based on an analysis of interviews with environmentalists experienced in consensus-building, I conclude that activists in fact maintain an adversarial ideological stance toward industry and state actors and they subsume this stance under a more cooperative, 'consensus' framework. This is a form of 'infrapolitics'Ña covertly subversive act undertaken by subjugated groups in the presence of more powerful actors.

Suggested Citation

  • David N. Pellow, "undated". "New Models for Struggle: Environmental Decision Making Through Consensus," IPR working papers 96-34, Institute for Policy Resarch at Northwestern University.
  • Handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-34
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:nwuipr:96-34. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ipnwuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.