IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wop/gemaec/9704.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Why Are Most Universities Not For Profit

Author

Listed:
  • Tyler Cowen
  • Sam Papenfuss

Abstract

We survey and evaluate explanations for the widespread use of the non-profit form in higher education, including the subsidies hypothesis, the donative hypothesis, efficient faculty monitoring, the trust hypothesis, and the reputation hypothesis. We confront the available hypothesis with the evidence on the observed cross sectional variation between for-profit and non profit educational institutions. For profits are in fact wide-spread in higher education, although they do not have a strong presence in the high quality end of the market. We find strongest support for a dual hypothesis of maximizing the efficiency of reputational certification and attracting donations. Non-profits certify the reputation of the high quality students and faculty, rather than the individuals willing to pay the most. Donations then are used to maintain the pecuniary value of the institution.

Suggested Citation

  • Tyler Cowen & Sam Papenfuss, "undated". "Why Are Most Universities Not For Profit," Working Papers 9704, George Mason University.
    • Handle: RePEc:wop:gemaec:9704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Alexis Walckiers, 2008. "Multi-dimensional contracts with task-specific productivity: an application to universities," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 15(2), pages 165-198, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wop:gemaec:9704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Thomas Krichel (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edgmuus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.