IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wus009/338.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien-Sektor in Österreich. Struktur, Entwicklungsdynamik und räumliche Muster

Author

Listed:
  • Lengauer, Lukas
  • Tödtling, Franz
  • Trippl, Michaela

Abstract

Im letzten Jahrzehnt wird in der wissenschaftlichen Diskussion auf die wachsende Bedeutung der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien (IKT) und ihre Schlüsselrolle in der sich herausbildenden Wissensökonomie hingewiesen. Das Ziel dieses Artikels besteht darin, die internationale Positionierung Österreichs in diesem wichtigen Zukunftsfeld zu bestimmen, seine räumlichen Muster zu untersuchen und die Rolle Wiens als wichtigsten nationalen IKT-Standort näher zu beleuchten. In einem ersten Schritt werden verschiedene Möglichkeiten der Abgrenzung des Sektors und seine zentralen Charakteristika zur Diskussion gestellt. Anschließend werden die Größe, Struktur und Dynamik des österreichischen IKT-Sektors sowie seine Stärken und Schwächen dargestellt. Danach wird der Fokus auf den wichtigen, bislang aber noch nicht erforschten Bereich der räumlichen Dimension des Sektors gerichtet. Auf der Grundlage einer eigenen Untersuchung werden Erkenntnisse zum Standortmuster des österreichischen IKT-Sektors und seine r räumliche Entwicklungsdynamik vorgestellt. Abschließend wird der IKT-Standort Wien untersucht, der sowohl in Bezug auf die Beschäftigung, als auch auf die Innovationstätigkeit in Österreich führend ist. (Autorenref.)

Suggested Citation

  • Lengauer, Lukas & Tödtling, Franz & Trippl, Michaela, 2006. "Der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien-Sektor in Österreich. Struktur, Entwicklungsdynamik und räumliche Muster," SRE-Discussion Papers 2006/06, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wus009:338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://epub.wu.ac.at/338/
    File Function: original version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Paul A. David & Dominique Foray, "undated". "Economic Fundamentals of the Knowledge Society," Working Papers 02003, Stanford University, Department of Economics.
    2. Ron A. Boschma & Anet B.R. Weterings, 2005. "The effect of regional differences on the performance of software firms in the Netherlands," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 5(5), pages 567-588, October.
    3. David, Paul A, 1990. "The Dynamo and the Computer: An Historical Perspective on the Modern Productivity Paradox," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 80(2), pages 355-361, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Trippl, Michaela & Lengauer, Lukas & Tödtling, Franz, 2007. "Innovation und Wissensnetze im Wiener Informations- und Kommunikationtechnologiecluster," SRE-Discussion Papers 2007/02, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business.
    2. Raouf Boucekkine & Fernando Del Río & Omar Licandro, 2003. "Embodied Technological Change, Learning‐by‐doing and the Productivity Slowdown," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 105(1), pages 87-98, March.
    3. Antonin BERGEAUD & Gilbert Cette & Rémy Lecat, 2017. "What role did education, equipment age and technology play in 20th century productivity growth?," Rue de la Banque, Banque de France, issue 43, may..
    4. Kiley, Michael T., 2001. "Computers and growth with frictions: aggregate and disaggregate evidence," Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 171-215, December.
    5. Andrew Reeson & Lachlan Rudd, 2016. "ICT Activity, Innovation and Productivity: An Analysis of Data From Australian Businesses," Economic Papers, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 35(3), pages 245-255, September.
    6. Jeffrey Ding & Allan Dafoe, 2021. "Engines of Power: Electricity, AI, and General-Purpose Military Transformations," Papers 2106.04338, arXiv.org.
    7. Giacomello, Giampiero & Picci, Lucio, 2003. "My scale or your meter? Evaluating methods of measuring the Internet," Information Economics and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 363-383, September.
    8. Aghion, Philippe & Akcigit, Ufuk & Howitt, Peter, 2014. "What Do We Learn From Schumpeterian Growth Theory?," Handbook of Economic Growth, in: Philippe Aghion & Steven Durlauf (ed.), Handbook of Economic Growth, edition 1, volume 2, chapter 0, pages 515-563, Elsevier.
    9. Schilirò, Daniele, 2005. "Economia della conoscenza,istituzioni e sviluppo economico [Knowledge-based economy, institutions and economic development]," MPRA Paper 31492, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    10. Karl Whelan, 2002. "Some New Economy Lessons for Macroeconomists," Recherches économiques de Louvain, De Boeck Université, vol. 68(1), pages 21-36.
    11. Leonardo Felli & Francois Ortalo-Magne, "undated". ""Technological Innovations: Slumps and Booms''," CARESS Working Papres 97-17, University of Pennsylvania Center for Analytic Research and Economics in the Social Sciences.
    12. Venturini, Francesco, 2022. "Intelligent technologies and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the Fourth Industrial Revolution," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 220-243.
    13. Jon Wisman, 2001. "Creative destruction and labor's options," Forum for Social Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 30(2), pages 51-76, January.
    14. Harald Edquist & Magnus Henrekson, 2006. "Technological Breakthroughs and Productivity Growth," Research in Economic History, in: Research in Economic History, pages 1-53, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
    15. Björn Brey, 2021. "The Long-run Gains from the Early Adoption of Electricity," Working Papers ECARES 2021-23, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    16. Andrew Atkeson & Patrick J. Kehoe, 2002. "The transition to a new economy after the Second Industrial Revolution," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Nov.
    17. Bulat Sanditov & Saurabh Arora, 2016. "Social network and private provision of public goods," Journal of Evolutionary Economics, Springer, vol. 26(1), pages 195-218, March.
    18. Prasanna Tambe & Lorin M. Hitt, 2014. "Job Hopping, Information Technology Spillovers, and Productivity Growth," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 60(2), pages 338-355, February.
    19. Ajay Agrawal & Joshua Gans & Avi Goldfarb, 2019. "Economic Policy for Artificial Intelligence," Innovation Policy and the Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 19(1), pages 139-159.
    20. Galor, Oded & Tsiddon, Daniel, 1997. "The Distribution of Human Capital and Economic Growth," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 2(1), pages 93-124, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wus009:338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: WU Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://research.wu.ac.at/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.