IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wiw/wiwrsa/ersa02p272.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Consumer´s appreciation of regional image and the perceived quality of rural tourism

Author

Listed:
  • Dimara, Efthalia
  • Petrou, Anastasia
  • Skuras, Dimitris

Abstract

Tourists' perception of regional image is critical as regards the degree of satisfaction obtained from the overall tourism experience. The present paper analyses the ways in which a region's image is incorporated into the tourist products and the overall tourism experience. Regional image is acknowledged to entail elements of the socio-cultural, environmental and historical heritage of a region. The latter affect the quality of the tourist product as perceived by the tourists. Consequently, they also affect the tourist's subjective judgement of satisfaction based on the quality of the tourism experience they have 'consumed'. The present paper utilizes data drawn from an EU Research Project (SPRITE QLK5-CT-2000-01211) survey conducted in two regional sites of rural tourism in Greece. Analysis and results focus especially on comparisons between the two study regions. Further, policy implications as regards the development of the rural tourism product, are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimara, Efthalia & Petrou, Anastasia & Skuras, Dimitris, 2002. "Consumer´s appreciation of regional image and the perceived quality of rural tourism," ERSA conference papers ersa02p272, European Regional Science Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www-sre.wu.ac.at/ersa/ersaconfs/ersa02/cd-rom/papers/272.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dimara, Efthalia & Skuras, Dimitris, 1999. "Regional Image and the Promotion of Quality Products," ERSA conference papers ersa99pa023, European Regional Science Association.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dimitris Skuras & Anastasia Petrou & Gordon Clark, 2006. "Demand for rural tourism: the effects of quality and information," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 35(2), pages 183-192, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.

      More about this item

      Statistics

      Access and download statistics

      Corrections

      All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wiw:wiwrsa:ersa02p272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

      If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

      If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

      If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

      For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Gunther Maier (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.ersa.org .

      Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

      IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.