IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wes/weswpa/2024-014.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating the Liquidity of Retailers Terminating Operations: Lessons to Take to the Classroom

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Gosman

    (Department of Economics, Wesleyan University)

  • Mathius Gazi

    (Department of Economics, Wesleyan University)

  • Liam Kennedy

    (Department of Economics, Wesleyan University)

  • Sophia Lindus

    (Department of Economics, Wesleyan University)

Abstract

Although firms that go defunct usually have precarious liquidity situations, how often do the financial ratios highlighted in accounting and finance textbooks provide a warning sign? To address this issue, eighteen retailers that issued their last 10-Ks for fiscal years ranging from 2007 through 2018 are matched with similar retailers that continued in business. Little differentiation is seen when current ratios are compared for both sets of firms, as many about-to-be defunct firms continue to report very respectable current-ratio levels. On the other hand, the two sets of firms are clearly distinguished from one another when the focus turns to a cash-oriented liquidity measure, specifically the operating cash flow ratio. In contrast to their surviving peers, the defunct firms reported little if any operating cash in their last 10-K. Cash is what a firm uses to pay its bills, and the current assets of accounts receivable and inventory do not provide a direct substitute for cash when a firm faces a liquidity crises. In a teaching note that follows, students examine whether warning flags were sent up by the two liquidity measures in seven recent retailer bankruptcies and address discussion question that enable them to revisit key points raised in the case.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Gosman & Mathius Gazi & Liam Kennedy & Sophia Lindus, 2024. "Evaluating the Liquidity of Retailers Terminating Operations: Lessons to Take to the Classroom," Wesleyan Economics Working Papers 2024-014, Wesleyan University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:wes:weswpa:2024-014
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.wesleyan.edu/pdf/mgosman/2024014_gosman.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wes:weswpa:2024-014. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Manolis Kaparakis (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/edwesus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.