IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/969.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Imports , exports , and industrial performance in India , 1970-88

Author

Listed:
  • Aksoy, M. Ataman
  • Tang, Helena

Abstract

In the 1960's and 1970's, India's policy of encouraging self-sufficiency by restricting imports was complemented by regulation of all facets of the industrial environment. Still, India developed a large, diversified manufacturing sector. In 1977-78, the policy environment began to change - with a relaxing of import controls and restrictions that has continued until now. With reform of industrial policies and a more expansionary macroeconomic policy, the value added in manufacturing grew from 4.5 percent a year in the 1970's to 7.9 percent a year in the 1980's. Meanwhile, gradual depreciation of the currency since 1985 has encouraged exports and brought prices in India closer to world levels. The faster growth of output and productivity in the 1980's is a welcome change from India's earlier stagnation. But deteriorating macroeconomic balances have brought India to a balance of payments crisis. Changes in tariffs and other instruments have more than compensated for relaxation of the import regime. Foreign trade has contracted relative to domestic output, despite some relaxation of quantity restrictions and attempts to increase exports. The main reason for this decline has been the increase in import prices relative to domestic output because of increasing tariffs, large real devaluations (especially after 1986), and rapidly expnanding domestic demand, which have made the domestic market more attractive than exports. Policy reform has led to faster growth of manufacturing output and productivity, but the main force behind faster growth has been increased public spending fueled by growing fiscal deficits. Another important variable has been a more accommodating import policy sustained by large external borrowings. This pattern of growth is not sustainable because of significant internal and external debt stocks that have accumulated over the last decade. Macroeconomic and trade policy must change significantly to shift the economy to a more export-oriented path - both to overcome the foreign exchange shortages and to rely more on external demand for industrial output. The authors argue that the manufacturing sector is highly responsive to relative price changes. Pessimism about elasticity has pervaded Indian policy making but they show high elasticities, indicating that the economy would respond favorably to changes in incentives.

Suggested Citation

  • Aksoy, M. Ataman & Tang, Helena, 1992. "Imports , exports , and industrial performance in India , 1970-88," Policy Research Working Paper Series 969, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:969
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1992/08/01/000009265_3961007042453/Rendered/PDF/multi0page.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lucas, Robert E. B., 1988. "Demand for India's manufactured exports," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 63-75, July.
    2. N. Jayaram & Surendra K. Gupta & A.P. Barnabas & Sachchidananda & P.S. Pachauri & M.L. Khattar & B.N. Sampath & H. R. Khanna, 1985. "India," India Quarterly: A Journal of International Affairs, , vol. 41(1), pages 177-179, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Levien, Michael, 2015. "Social Capital as Obstacle to Development: Brokering Land, Norms, and Trust in Rural India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 77-92.
    2. Nahar, N.M., 1992. "Performance studies of a large size nontracking solar cooker," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 2(4), pages 421-430.
    3. Arindam Das-Gupta & Ira Gang, 2000. "Decomposing Revenue Effects of Tax Evasion and Tax Structure Changes," International Tax and Public Finance, Springer;International Institute of Public Finance, vol. 7(2), pages 177-194, March.
    4. Hans Binswanger & Shahidur Khandker, 1995. "The impact of formal finance on the rural economy of India," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(2), pages 234-262.
    5. Vani Borooah & Sriya Iyer, 2005. "Vidya, Veda, and Varna: The influence of religion and caste on education in rural India," Journal of Development Studies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(8), pages 1369-1404.
    6. Kunting Chen, 2012. "Analysis of the Great Divergence under a Unified Endogenous Growth Model," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 13(2), pages 317-353, November.
    7. Ira N. Gang & Arindam Das-Gupta, 1998. "Decomposing Revenue Effects of Tax Evasion, Base Broadening and Tax Rate Reduction," Departmental Working Papers 199506, Rutgers University, Department of Economics.
    8. Zafar Iqbal Qureshi, 2005. "Impact of Management Practices on Employee Effectiveness in South Asia," Labor Economics Working Papers 22273, East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
    9. Besley, Timothy & Leight, Jessica & Pande, Rohini & Rao, Vijayendra, 2016. "Long-run impacts of land regulation: Evidence from tenancy reform in India," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 72-87.
    10. Sheriffdeen A. Tella & Olumuyiwa G. Yinusa & Ayinde Taofeek Olusola & Saban Celik, 2011. "Global Economic Crisis And Stock Markets Efficiency: Evidence From Selected Africa Countries," Bogazici Journal, Review of Social, Economic and Administrative Studies, Bogazici University, Department of Economics, vol. 25(1), pages 139-169.
    11. Binswanger, Hans P. & Deininger, Klaus & Feder, Gershon, 1995. "Power, distortions, revolt and reform in agricultural land relations," Handbook of Development Economics, in: Hollis Chenery & T.N. Srinivasan (ed.), Handbook of Development Economics, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 42, pages 2659-2772, Elsevier.
    12. Fikkert, Brian & Hasan, Rana, 1998. "Returns to scale in a highly regulated economy: evidence from Indian firms," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 51-79, June.
    13. Daron Acemoglu & Simon Johnson & James A. Robinson, 2002. "Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 117(4), pages 1231-1294.
    14. Dutta, Sujoy, 2015. "An uneven path to accountability: A comparative study of MGNREGA in two states of India," Discussion Papers, Inequality and Social Policy SP I 2015-201, WZB Berlin Social Science Center.
    15. Ramasamy, C., 2004. "Constraints to Growth in Indian Agriculture: Needed Technology, Resource Management and Trade Strategies," Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Indian Society of Agricultural Economics, vol. 59(1), pages 1-41.
    16. Baiardi, Donatella & Bianchi, Carluccio & Lorenzini, Eleonora, 2015. "The price and income elasticities of the top clothing exporters: Evidence from a panel data analysis," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 14-30.
    17. Sinha Roy, Saikat, 2007. "Demand and Supply Factors in the Determination of India's Disaggregated Manufactured Exports: A Simultaneous Error-Correction Aprroach," MPRA Paper 68589, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    18. Zingel, W.-P., 1988. "Verbrauchersubventionen, Agrar- und Einkommenspolitik in den Ländern Südasiens," Proceedings “Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaues e.V.”, German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA), vol. 24.
    19. Raju, S.S. & Chand, Ramesh, 2008. "A Study on the Performance of National Agricultural Insurance Scheme and Suggestions to Make it More Effective," Agricultural Economics Research Review, Agricultural Economics Research Association (India), vol. 21(1).
    20. Andrew Young, 2015. "From Caesar to Tacitus: changes in early Germanic governance circa 50 BC-50 AD," Public Choice, Springer, vol. 164(3), pages 357-378, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:969. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.