IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/8626.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Tobacco Taxation Incidence : Evidence from the Russian Federation

Author

Listed:
  • Fuchs Tarlovsky,Alan
  • Matytsin,Mikhail
  • Obukhova,Olga

Abstract

Despite the well-known positive effects of tobacco taxes on health outcomes, policy makers avoid relying on such taxes because of their possible regressive impact. Using an extended cost-benefit analysis to estimate the distributional effect of cigarettes in the Russian Federation, this paper finds that the long-run impact may in fact be progressive. The methodology applied incorporates the negative price effect caused by an increase in tobacco taxes, combined with a presumed future reduction in medical expenditures and a rise in working years caused by a reduction in the rate of smoking among the population. The analysis includes estimates of the distributional impacts of price rises on cigarettes under various scenarios, based on information taken from the Russia Longitudinal Monitoring Survey -- Higher School of Economics for 2010?16. One contribution is the quantification of impacts by allowing price elasticities to vary across consumption deciles. Overall, cigarette taxes exert a positive long-term effect on household incomes, although the magnitude depends on the structure of the conditional price elasticity. If the population is more responsive to tobacco price changes, then it would experience greater gains from the health and extended work-life benefits.

Suggested Citation

  • Fuchs Tarlovsky,Alan & Matytsin,Mikhail & Obukhova,Olga, 2018. "Tobacco Taxation Incidence : Evidence from the Russian Federation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 8626, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:8626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/508191540824515851/pdf/WPS8626.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fuchs Tarlovsky,Alan & Gonzalez Icaza,Maria Fernanda, 2020. "Taxing Tobacco in Georgia : Welfare and Distributional Gains of Smoking Cessation," Policy Research Working Paper Series 9130, The World Bank.
    2. Jain, Vageesh & Crosby, Liam & Baker, Peter & Chalkidou, Kalipso, 2020. "Distributional equity as a consideration in economic and modelling evaluations of health taxes: A systematic review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 124(9), pages 919-931.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:8626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.