IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/wbk/wbrwps/312.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Improving public enterprise performance : lessons from South Korea

Author

Listed:
  • Shirley, Mary M.

Abstract

In 1983 Korea dramatically changed the way it managed the largest and most important group of its public enterprises, or GIEs. The reforms increased enterprise autonomy, changed managerial selection procedures, and began systematically to evaluate performance and provide incentives on the basis of the evaluation. This paper assesses the results of these reforms and suggests ways the Korean performance evaluation system might be adapted to cicumstances in other countries. A central feature of the Korean reforms is the performance evaluation system, which sets clear targets for management and provides bonuses on the basis of outcomes. The system has four essential prerequisites for success : 1) parallel reforms to increase managerial autonomy and skills, 2) reliable and timely information, 3) adequate skills to supervise and evaluate, and 4) political will. This paper suggests ways to build up and compensate for the first three requirement; there is no substitute for the fourth.

Suggested Citation

  • Shirley, Mary M., 1989. "Improving public enterprise performance : lessons from South Korea," Policy Research Working Paper Series 312, The World Bank.
  • Handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:312
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/1989/10/01/000009265_3960928101909/Rendered/PDF/multi_page.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Penggui YAN, 1995. "SOUTH KOREA'S PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM: Some issues further considered," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 66(3), pages 321-344, September.
    2. Lim, Wonhyuk, 2003. "Public Enterprise Reform and Privatization in Korea: Lessons for Developing Countries," KDI Policy Studies 2003-04, Korea Development Institute (KDI).
    3. Demirguc-Kunt, Asli & Levine, Ross & DEC, 1994. "The financial system and public enterprise reform : concepts and cases," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1319, The World Bank.
    4. David HEALD, 1992. "How Much Privatization Should There Be In Developing Countries?," Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 229-269, April.
    5. L. Alan Winters & Wonhyuk Lim & Lucia Hanmer & Sidney Augustin, 2010. "Economic growth in low income countries: How the G20 can help to raise and sustain it," Working Paper Series 0810, Department of Economics, University of Sussex Business School.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wbk:wbrwps:312. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Roula I. Yazigi (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dvewbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.