IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vuw/vuwcpf/22008.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Summary Measures of Equalising Income Mobility Based on ‘Three Is of Mobility’ Curves

Author

Listed:
  • Creedy, John
  • Gemmell, Norman

Abstract

This paper extends the ‘Three Is of Mobility (TIM) Curve’ framework, developed by Creedy and Gemmell (2019) to produce summary measures of equalising mobility between two periods, based on areas within the diagram. Two concepts of equalising mobility are considered. The first involves equalisation of incomes in the second period, achieved by a compression of incomes and no re-ranking. The second concept involves maximum redistribution in terms of the inequality of incomes measured over the two periods combined. This involves differential income growth and maximum re-ranking, whereby second period incomes are ‘swapped’: the richest person becomes the poorest, and so on. The measures are illustrated using a large sample of taxpayers’ incomes in New Zealand.

Suggested Citation

  • Creedy, John & Gemmell, Norman, 2022. "Summary Measures of Equalising Income Mobility Based on ‘Three Is of Mobility’ Curves," Working Paper Series 22008, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
  • Handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwcpf:22008
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ir.wgtn.ac.nz/handle/123456789/22008
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. John Creedy & Norman Gemmell, 2022. "Illustrating Income Mobility and Poverty Persistence," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 55(2), pages 309-323, June.
    2. Van Kerm, Philippe, 2009. "Income mobility profiles," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 93-95, February.
    3. Stephen P. Jenkins & Philippe Van Kerm, 2016. "Assessing Individual Income Growth," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 83(332), pages 679-703, October.
    4. John Creedy & Norman Gemmell, 2018. "Income Dynamics, Pro‐Poor Mobility and Poverty Persistence Curves," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 94(306), pages 316-328, September.
    5. John Creedy & Norman Gemmell, 2019. "Illustrating income mobility: new measures," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 71(3), pages 733-755.
    6. Jenkins, Stephen P & Lambert, Peter J, 1997. "Three 'I's of Poverty Curves, with an Analysis of UK Poverty Trends," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 49(3), pages 317-327, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. John Creedy & Norman Gemmell, 2022. "Illustrating Income Mobility and Poverty Persistence," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 55(2), pages 309-323, June.
    2. John Creedy & Norman Gemmell, 2022. "Illustrating Income Mobility and Poverty Persistence," Australian Economic Review, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research, vol. 55(2), pages 309-323, June.
    3. Alinaghi, Nazila & Creedy, John & Gemmell, Norman, 2022. "Inter-Decile Income Movements of Individuals in New Zealand: Evidence from Administrative Data," Working Paper Series 21357, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    4. John Creedy & Norman Gemmell, 2018. "Income Dynamics, Pro‐Poor Mobility and Poverty Persistence Curves," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 94(306), pages 316-328, September.
    5. John Creedy & Norman Gemmell, 2018. "Income Dynamics, Pro‐Poor Mobility and Poverty Persistence Curves," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 94(306), pages 316-328, September.
    6. Creedy, John & Gemmell, Norman, 2017. "Illustrating Income Mobility: Two New Measures," Working Paper Series 6693, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    7. Alinaghi, Nazila & Creedy, John & Gemmell, Norman, 2022. "Income Inequality and the Accounting Period in New Zealand: Evidence from Administrative Data," Working Paper Series 21899, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    8. David (David Patrick) Madden, 2019. "BMI Mobility and Obesity Transitions Among Children in Ireland," Working Papers 201922, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
    9. Maria C. Lo Bue & Flaviana Palmisano, 2020. "The Individual Poverty Incidence of Growth," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 82(6), pages 1295-1321, December.
    10. Aart Kraay & Roy Weide, 2022. "Measuring intragenerational mobility using aggregate data," Journal of Economic Growth, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 273-314, June.
    11. Creedy, John & Gemmell, Norman, 2017. "Illustrating Income Mobility: Two New Measures," Working Paper Series 20282, Victoria University of Wellington, Chair in Public Finance.
    12. Espinoza-Delgado, José & Silber, Jacques, 2018. "Multi-dimensional poverty among adults in Central America and gender differences in the three I’s of poverty: Applying inequality sensitive poverty measures with ordinal variables," MPRA Paper 88750, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    13. Stephen P. Jenkins & Philippe Van Kerm, 2016. "Assessing Individual Income Growth," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 83(332), pages 679-703, October.
    14. B. Essama‐Nssah & Peter J. Lambert, 2009. "Measuring Pro‐Poorness: A Unifying Approach With New Results," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 55(3), pages 752-778, September.
    15. Duclos, Jean-Yves & Araar, Abdelkrim & Giles, John, 2010. "Chronic and transient poverty: Measurement and estimation, with evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 91(2), pages 266-277, March.
    16. Russell Davidson & Jean-Yves Duclos, 2000. "Statistical Inference for Stochastic Dominance and for the Measurement of Poverty and Inequality," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 68(6), pages 1435-1464, November.
    17. Frank Cowell & Udo Ebert, 2004. "Complaints and inequality," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 23(1), pages 71-89, August.
    18. Flaviana Palmisano, 2018. "Evaluating Patterns of Income Growth when Status Matters: A Robust Approach," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 64(1), pages 147-169, March.
    19. Alkire, Sabina & Santos, Maria Emma, 2014. "Measuring Acute Poverty in the Developing World: Robustness and Scope of the Multidimensional Poverty Index," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 251-274.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vuw:vuwcpf:22008. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Library Technology Services (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fcvuwnz.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.