IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vua/wpaper/2002-25.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Development and management of green spaces in European cities: a comparative analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Baycan-Levent, T.

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)

  • Leeuwen, E. van
  • Rodenburg, C. et. Al.

Abstract

The provision, design, management and protection of urban green spaces are at the top of the agenda of 'sustainability' and 'liveability' of human settlements for improving the quality of local environments. Quality of urban green spaces is a key factor in making cities attractive and viable places to live in. Urban green spaces play an important role in improving the liveability of towns and cities. The present paper considers urban green spaces as an important contribution to a sustainable development of cities. From this perspective, this paper aims to investigate and compare the present state and availability of urban green spaces in various European cities. The results of a multidimensional factor analysis and a spider model applied to a database gathered by means of extensive survey questionnaires show interesting links and patterns between and in European cities. Factor analysis shows that the availability of 'urban green' is relatively high in metropoles and big cities, whereas the availebility of natural green' is relatively high in medium sized and small cities. On the other hand, spider models show that the availability of green spaces per inhabitant is higher in small and medium-sized cities than in metropoles and big cities. This comparative framework shows that the conditions in terms of the green space available to the inhabitants are more problematic for metropoles and big cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Baycan-Levent, T. & Leeuwen, E. van & Rodenburg, C. et. Al., 2002. "Development and management of green spaces in European cities: a comparative analysis," Serie Research Memoranda 0025, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
  • Handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2002-25
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/20020025.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Muhammad Rayan & Dietwald Gruehn & Umer Khayyam, 2022. "Frameworks for Urban Green Infrastructure (UGI) Indicators: Expert and Community Outlook toward Green Climate-Resilient Cities in Pakistan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-30, June.
    2. Mehdi RAKHSHANDEHROO & Mohd Johari MOHDYUSOF & Osman Mohd TAHIRHOLDER & Mohd Yazid Mohd YUNOS, 2015. "The Socialbenefits Of Urban Open Green Spaces: A Literature Review," Management Research and Practice, Research Centre in Public Administration and Public Services, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 7(4), pages 60-71, December.
    3. Muhammad Rayan & Dietwald Gruehn & Umer Khayyam, 2022. "Planning for Sustainable Green Urbanism: An Empirical Bottom-Up (Community-Led) Perspective on Green Infrastructure (GI) Indicators in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), Pakistan," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-29, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2002-25. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: R. Dam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fewvunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.