IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vua/wpaper/2001-11.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Beyond the espoused goals of IS/IT strategy planning

Author

Listed:
  • Heng, Michael S.H.

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)

  • Newman, Mike

Abstract

The paper uses a sociological concept to study the uses of strategic information systems/information technology planning (SISP) beyond its espoused goals. The concept is termed unanticipated or unintended consequences of social action (Merton 1963; Giddens 1984), and it has a long intellectual history, going back to at least the writings of Adam Smith. The main goals of SISP are to align investment in IT with business goals, to exploit IT for competitive advantage, to deliver efficient and effective management of IT resources, and to develop technology policies and architectures. The research findings of the uses of SISP are focused on these goals and produce a rather mixed picture (Runge and Earl 1988; Segar and Grover 1998). However, another way is to look at the uses of SISP beyond its proclaimed goals. Based on such approach, a study of IS and organization literature suggests that SISP can be employed in ways which may seem alien to the original designers of these methods, but which make sense from the perspective of interpretative organizational studies and sociology. Our study suggests that SISP is used in the following ways: (1) to organize thoughts and articulate ideas about information planning activities, (2) to present and interpret past activities, (3) to provide a

Suggested Citation

  • Heng, Michael S.H. & Newman, Mike, 2001. "Beyond the espoused goals of IS/IT strategy planning," Serie Research Memoranda 0011, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
    • Handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2001-11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/20010011.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mouritsen, Jan, 1994. "Rationality, institutions and decision making: Reflections on March and Olsen's rediscovering institutions," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 19(2), pages 193-211, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Malmi, Teemu, 1999. "Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 24(8), pages 649-672, November.
    2. Yazdifar, Hassan & Zaman, Mahbub & Tsamenyi, Mathew & Askarany, Davood, 2008. "Management accounting change in a subsidiary organisation," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 19(3), pages 404-430.
    3. Christensen, Mark & Skærbæk, Peter, 2010. "Consultancy outputs and the purification of accounting technologies," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 35(5), pages 524-545, July.
    4. Margaret A. Abernethy & Wai Fong Chua, 1996. "A Field Study of Control System “Redesign†: The Impact of Institutional Processes on Strategic Choice," Contemporary Accounting Research, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 13(2), pages 569-606, September.
    5. Stephanos Avakian & Marianna Fotaki, 2024. "Accounting for Failure Through Morality: The IMF’s Involvement in (Mis)managing the Greek Crisis," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 189(4), pages 817-841, February.
    6. Ozdil, Esin & Hoque, Zahirul, 2017. "Budgetary change at a university: A narrative inquiry," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 49(3), pages 316-328.
    7. Laura Girella, 2013. "Regulating through the "Logic of Appropriateness" and the "Rhetoric of the Expert": The Role of Consultants in the Case of Intangibles Reporting in Germany," FINANCIAL REPORTING, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2013(3-4), pages 75-109.
    8. Georgiou, Omiros & Jack, Lisa, 2011. "In pursuit of legitimacy: A history behind fair value accounting," The British Accounting Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(4), pages 311-323.
    9. Sven Modell, 2002. "Institutional perspectives on cost allocations: integration and extension," European Accounting Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(4), pages 653-679.
    10. Cooper, David J. & Robson, Keith, 2006. "Accounting, professions and regulation: Locating the sites of professionalization," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 31(4-5), pages 415-444.
    11. Amalou-Döpke, Linda & Süß, Stefan, 2014. "HR measurement as an instrument of the HR department in its exchange relationship with top management: A qualitative study based on resource dependence theory," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 30(4), pages 444-460.
    12. Eriksen, Scott D. & Urrutia, Ignacio, 2005. "An institutional sociology perspective of the implementation of activity based costing by Spanish health care institutions," IESE Research Papers D/582, IESE Business School.
    13. Jeaneth Johansson & Malin Malmström & Joakim Wincent & Vinit Parida, 2021. "How individual cognitions overshadow regulations and group norms: a study of government venture capital decisions," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 56(2), pages 857-876, February.
    14. Lennon, Niels Joseph, 2019. "Responsibility accounting, managerial action and ‘a counter-ability’: Relating the physical and virtual spaces of decision-making," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 35(3).
    15. Mouritsen, Jan & Kreiner, Kristian, 2016. "Accounting, decisions and promises," Accounting, Organizations and Society, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 21-31.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    unanticipated or unintended uses; IS/IT strategy; structured methods; deconstructionist approach; interpretation; diagnosis; assigning blame; control; legitimization.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • L86 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Information and Internet Services; Computer Software
    • M13 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - New Firms; Startups

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:2001-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: R. Dam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fewvunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.