IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/vua/wpaper/1997-5.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Multicriteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural land use : a case of Lesvos

Author

Listed:
  • Hermanides, Gerda

    (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Faculteit der Economische Wetenschappen en Econometrie (Free University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics Sciences, Business Administration and Economitrics)

  • Nijkamp, Peter

Abstract

Sustainable agriculture has become an important policy orientation in the area of land use. It serves as an analysis framework to reconcile conflicting interests. In the paper the notion of sustainable agriculture will be operationalized by using the concept of environmental utilisation space. This concept offers critical threshold values for various socio-economic and environmental indicators.The paper allows for flexibility and variability in expert opinion on sustainable agriculture by distinguishing various ranges of carrying capacity. Pending on the seriousness of the social costs involved, a ‘flag model’ is used to analyze the various trade-offs. Next, a multicriteria method using the Regime method is introduced in order to identify compromise solutions.The (stepwise) sustainability methodology will be applied to the case of agricuIture on the island of Lesvos, Greece. The Lesvian agriculture is faced with the threat of erosion and degradation caused by various interlinked developments. Three policy orientations on agriculture on Lesvos are evaluated by means of the flag evaluation method and the Regime method. According to the flag approach, a policy of structural support leads to the most sustainable situation. The scenario of environmental care in agriculture is next the most sustainable, while the scenario of liberalisation of agricultural markets and agricultural trade performs worst. This outcome corresponds to the majority of the outcomes of the Regime evaluation. Thus, the sustainability and continuity of agriculture seems to be best served by public, socio- economic support. Liberalisation of agricultural markets may certainly also be opted for, but would make the future of Lesvos undecisive.

Suggested Citation

  • Hermanides, Gerda & Nijkamp, Peter, 1997. "Multicriteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural land use : a case of Lesvos," Serie Research Memoranda 0005, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.
  • Handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:1997-5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://degree.ubvu.vu.nl/repec/vua/wpaper/pdf/19970005.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Nijkamp, Peter & Torrieri, Francesca, 2000. "A decision support system for assessing alternative projects for the design of a new road network : methodology and application of a case study," Serie Research Memoranda 0021, VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • Q15 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Land Ownership and Tenure; Land Reform; Land Use; Irrigation; Agriculture and Environment
    • Q24 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Renewable Resources and Conservation - - - Land

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vua:wpaper:1997-5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: R. Dam (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fewvunl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.