IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ver/wpaper/43-2007.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

La gestione dei rifiuti da apparecchiature elettriche ed elettroniche dopo la direttiva 2002/96/CE

Author

Listed:
  • Giovanni Goldoni

    (Department of Economics (University of Verona))

Abstract

Lo smaltimento dei rifiuti è uno dei principali problemi che le economie moderne debbono affrontare. In questo lavoro si è studiato il caso di una particolare categoria di rifiuti, quelli generati dalle apparecchiature elettriche ed elettroniche dismesse (RAEE), che sta da qualche tempo crescendo a ritmi molto veloci. Per questo, i RAEE sono stati oggetto di una direttiva europea che, in analogia alla direttiva 2000/53/CE relativa ai veicoli a fine vita, definisce una serie di obblighi e di obiettivi in materia di raccolta e recupero. La direttiva 2002/96/CE introduce inoltre il principio fondamentale della responsabilità individuale dei produttori per la gestione dei rifiuti derivanti dai loro prodotti, con la finalità di promuovere generazioni future di apparecchiature più compatibili con l’ambiente. La traduzione di principi, obiettivi ed obblighi generali in regole dettagliate ed incentivi mirati spetta alle regolamentazioni nazionali. Per fare ciò nel migliore dei modi occorre per prima cosa definire i confini del problema e della situazione attuale sul fronte della raccolta e del recupero con le sue potenzialità di sviluppo. Congiuntamente, occorre studiare i comportamenti dei soggetti a cui si rivolge la nuova normativa per capire come potrebbero reagire alle nuove regole ed ai nuovi incentivi. L’analisi comparativa delle regolamentazioni in corso di definizione in Francia, Regno Unito ed Italia mette in luce il diverso approccio di fondo a cui le amministrazioni si ispirano e lascia intravedere i modelli verso cui esse spingono l’organizzazione del settore. Il caso della California è una cartina tornasole che offre i primi riscontri empirici dei comportamenti assunti e dei risultati ottenuti con regole ed incentivi nuovi in materia di rifiuti da apparecchiature elettriche ed elettroniche .

Suggested Citation

  • Giovanni Goldoni, 2007. "La gestione dei rifiuti da apparecchiature elettriche ed elettroniche dopo la direttiva 2002/96/CE," Working Papers 43/2007, University of Verona, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ver:wpaper:43/2007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dse.univr.it/RePEc/ver/Wpaper/WP43.pdf
    File Function: First version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michael Waldman, 1996. "Planned Obsolescence and the R&D Decision," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 27(3), pages 583-595, Autumn.
    2. Ferrer, Geraldo & Clay Whybark, D., 2000. "From garbage to goods: Successful remanufacturing systems and skills," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 43(6), pages 55-64.
    3. Michael Waldman, 1993. "A New Perspective on Planned Obsolescence," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 108(1), pages 273-283.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Basak Altan, 2020. "Dynamic Durable Goods Monopoly and Market Power," Games, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-14, May.
    2. Kutsoati, Edward & Zabojnik, Jan, 2005. "The effects of learning-by-doing on product innovation by a durable good monopolist," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 23(1-2), pages 83-108, February.
    3. Dennis W. Carlton & Michael Waldman, 2002. "The Strategic Use of Tying to Preserve and Create Market Power in Evolving Industries," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 33(2), pages 194-220, Summer.
    4. Cerquera Dussán, Daniel, 2007. "Durable Goods, Innovation and Network Externalities," ZEW Discussion Papers 07-086, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. Kuppelwieser, Volker G. & Klaus, Phil & Manthiou, Aikaterini & Boujena, Othman, 2019. "Consumer responses to planned obsolescence," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 157-165.
    6. Il-Horn Hann & Byungwan Koh & Marius F. Niculescu, 2016. "The Double-Edged Sword of Backward Compatibility: The Adoption of Multigenerational Platforms in the Presence of Intergenerational Services," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 27(1), pages 112-130, March.
    7. Kawamura, Kohei & Le Quement, Mark T., 2023. "News credibility and the quest for clicks," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    8. Eric BROUILLAT, 2011. "Durability of consumption goods and market competition: an agent-based modelling," Cahiers du GREThA (2007-2019) 2011-31, Groupe de Recherche en Economie Théorique et Appliquée (GREThA).
    9. Francesco Nava & Pasquale Schiraldi, 2019. "Differentiated Durable Goods Monopoly: A Robust Coase Conjecture," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 109(5), pages 1930-1968, May.
    10. Chen, Yijuan, 2012. "Innovation frequency of durable complementary goods," Journal of Mathematical Economics, Elsevier, vol. 48(6), pages 407-421.
    11. Ramesh Sankaranarayanan, 2007. "Innovation and the Durable Goods Monopolist: The Optimality of Frequent New-Version Releases," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(6), pages 774-791, 11-12.
    12. William Caylor, 2016. "Credible Signals Of The Release Of New Versions," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 54(2), pages 862-878, April.
    13. Li, Changying & Geng, Xiaoyan, 2008. "Licensing to a durable-good monopoly," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 25(5), pages 876-884, September.
    14. Choi Jay Pil, 2001. "Planned Obsolescence As A Signal of Quality," International Economic Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 15(4), pages 59-79.
    15. Carlaw, Kenneth I., 2005. "Optimal obsolescence," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 69(1), pages 21-45.
    16. Athanasopoulos, Thanos, 2013. "Efficient Upgrading in Network Goods : Is Commitment Always Good?," The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 1006, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
    17. Awrey, Dan, 2013. "Toward a supply-side theory of financial innovation," Journal of Comparative Economics, Elsevier, vol. 41(2), pages 401-419.
    18. Athanasopoulos, Thanos, 2015. "Efficient Upgrading in Durable Network Goods: Is Commitment Always Good?," Economic Research Papers 270543, University of Warwick - Department of Economics.
    19. Roland Strausz, "undated". "Planned Obsolescence and the Provision of Unobservable Quality," Papers 028, Departmental Working Papers.
    20. Waldman, Michael, 1997. "Eliminating the Market for Secondhand Goods: An Alternative Explanation for Leasing," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 40(1), pages 61-92, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ver:wpaper:43/2007. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Michael Reiter (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/isverit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.