IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uwa/wpaper/17-14.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Economic and Social Consequences of the War: Pigou, the Press and the Struggle for an Honourable Peace

Author

Listed:
  • Rogério Arthmar

    (Department of Economics, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Brazil)

  • Michael McLure

    (Business School, The University of Western Australia)

Abstract

This study reflects on Arthur Cecil Pigou’s contribution to public debate over Britain’s return to peace during the initial period the First World War. It explores Pigou's letters to The Nation, in early 1915, suggesting an open move by the Allies towards an honourable peace with Germany; and provides and account of the fierce controversy that erupted in the British press in reaction to Pigou's proposal. The study also places Pigou’s efforts at persuading the broader public of a peace treaty with Germany within the context of events at Cambridge. That is achieved by providing an outline of the March 1915 debate, at the Cambridge Union Society, on Pigou's motion for a moderate Allied peace policy to secure Germany’s ‘conditional’ surrender. Pigou's assessment of the conditions for peace is also compared with those formulated at the time by William Cunningham, Bertrand Russell and Goldsworthy Lowes Dickinson. The study ends with a critical reflection on Pigou’s plan for ending the war.

Suggested Citation

  • Rogério Arthmar & Michael McLure, 2017. "The Economic and Social Consequences of the War: Pigou, the Press and the Struggle for an Honourable Peace," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 17-14, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:uwa:wpaper:17-14
    Note: MD5 = 6f7a043c90b4e01c1f678a87620d83ce
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ecompapers.biz.uwa.edu.au/paper/PDF%20of%20Discussion%20Papers/2017/DP%2017.14_Arthmar%20and%20McLure.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    peace; war costs; reparations; foreign policy; commercial integration;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uwa:wpaper:17-14. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sam Tang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deuwaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.