IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uts/ppaper/2011-4.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Brief Critical Review of Australia's Retirement Savings System

Author

Abstract

On the first day in a new job in Australia, an employee will be asked “in which bank will we deposit your salary?” and “in which fund will we deposit your retirement savings contributions?” Australian companies have (almost) entirely outsourced retirement savings. For better and worse, companies and other organizations have (almost) no interest in or responsibility for their workers’ retirement; moreover (almost) all retirement savings vehicles are defined contribution (aka accumulation). This is surprising for a country with bipartisan support for the benefits of government-funded social welfare programs, especially because the retirement policies were driven largely by the union movement. Mercer ranks Australia’s pension system as one of the world’s best. Its size and success make it a magnet, and a rainmaker, for financial services professionals. The system has become fraught with myriad choices, which few members take advantage of, but which drive up overhead costs. In this article we review the history of Australian pensions and current reforms, and we point out where we believe the system could better serve its many millions of members.

Suggested Citation

  • Jack Gray & Ron Bird, 2011. "A Brief Critical Review of Australia's Retirement Savings System," Published Paper Series 2011-4, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney.
    • Handle: RePEc:uts:ppaper:2011-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wei-Ting Pan, 2016. "The Impact of Mandatory Savings on Life Cycle Consumption and Portfolio Choice," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 32, July-Dece.
    2. Georg Inderst & Raffaele Della Croce, 2013. "Pension Fund Investment in Infrastructure: A Comparison Between Australia and Canada," OECD Working Papers on Finance, Insurance and Private Pensions 32, OECD Publishing.
    3. Georg Inderst, 2009. "Pension Fund Investment in Infrastructure," OECD Working Papers on Insurance and Private Pensions 32, OECD Publishing.
    4. Wei-Ting Pan, 2016. "The Impact of Mandatory Savings on Life Cycle Consumption and Portfolio Choice," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 2-2016, January-A.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Australia retirement savings system; Australia pension system;

    JEL classification:

    • G10 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - General (includes Measurement and Data)
    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G23 - Financial Economics - - Financial Institutions and Services - - - Non-bank Financial Institutions; Financial Instruments; Institutional Investors

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uts:ppaper:2011-4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Duncan Ford (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sfutsau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.