IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/uto/eblawp/200712.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Collective intellectual property rights for the development of creative tourist districts: an exploration

Author

Listed:
  • Russo Antonio P.
  • Segre Giovanna

Abstract

In this paper the institution of Collective Intellectual Property Rights (CIPR) is proposed as a regulatory tool for the development of Creative Tourist Districts based on local knowledge and trust, described as a superior organisational model of destinations to alternative models founded on individual property. As there are various types and contexts of applications of CIPR, as well as different development objectives to be achieved, the paper designs a strategy to maximise the expected impacts from case to case. It then proposes “area labels”, based on a combination of controls on quality and delimitation of areas of validity of the right, as the best instrument to foster a strategic orientation to quality across the local tourism industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Russo Antonio P. & Segre Giovanna, 2008. "Collective intellectual property rights for the development of creative tourist districts: an exploration," EBLA Working Papers 200712, University of Turin.
    • Handle: RePEc:uto:eblawp:200712
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.eblacenter.unito.it/WP/2007/12_WP_Ebla.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tiziana Cuccia & Walter Santagata, 2003. "Adhesion-Exit: incentivi e diritti di propriet? collettivi nei distretti culturali," STUDI ECONOMICI, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2003(80).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Guido Candela & Paolo Figini, 2010. "Destination Unknown. Is there any Economics Beyond Tourism Areas?," Review of Economic Analysis, Digital Initiatives at the University of Waterloo Library, vol. 2(3), pages 256-271, September.

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:uto:eblawp:200712. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Piero Cavaleri or Marina Grazioli (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ebtorit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.