IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/usi/wpaper/816.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Appearances do mislead: Marxist economic theory and the demise of the labour theory of value.First part: The firm as a for-profit institution

Author

Listed:
  • Alberto Battistini

Abstract

by completely abandoning the labour theory of value, Marxist economic theory has actually obliterated Marx’s own contribution to that theory and more generally to the critique of political economy: the theory of surplus-value, that is, the difference between use value and exchange value of labour power as the determinant of profit in perfectly competitive conditions and of the contradictory character of the capital accumulation process. Starting from the observation that such a contribution is instead still relevant and timely, both in theoretical and practical terms, it is shown in this paper how it could be made independent from its original analytical formulation in terms of labour quantity. It is indeed that analytical formulation, which Marx largely borrowed from Ricardo, that today seems useless, again for both theoretical and practical reasons. More specifically, the first part of this paper addresses the static part of the aforementioned theory, verifying in particular the hypothesis that the role played by the Ricardian notion of production cost, which Marx, differently from Ricardo himself, used to determine wages, could be played by the general notion of transaction costs, in the Coasean meaning of the costs of using the price system. The second part, instead, addresses the dynamic part of the same theory, verifying in particular the hypothesis that capital, in Marx’s definition as money in motion in the Money ? Commodity ? More Money circuit, can be taken as the unit of analysis in an evolutionary process substituting the so-called circular view of the production process, which Marx also borrowed from Ricardo but in fact goes back directly to Quesnay and, equally significantly, was conceived with reference to an agricultural economy. The final result is an evolutionary and institutional re-interpretation of Marx’s version of the labour theory of value.

Suggested Citation

  • Alberto Battistini, 2019. "Appearances do mislead: Marxist economic theory and the demise of the labour theory of value.First part: The firm as a for-profit institution," Department of Economics University of Siena 816, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
  • Handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.deps.unisi.it/quaderni/816.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    transaction costs; wealth effects; use value; exchange value; differential replication; methodological individualism.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:usi:wpaper:816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Fabrizio Becatti (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/desieit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.