IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/upf/upfgen/198.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The minimax distortion redundancy in empirical quantizer design

Author

Listed:

Abstract

We obtain minimax lower and upper bounds for the expected distortion redundancy of empirically designed vector quantizers. We show that the mean squared distortion of a vector quantizer designed from $n$ i.i.d. data points using any design algorithm is at least $\Omega (n^{-1/2})$ away from the optimal distortion for some distribution on a bounded subset of ${\cal R}^d$. Together with existing upper bounds this result shows that the minimax distortion redundancy for empirical quantizer design, as a function of the size of the training data, is asymptotically on the order of $n^{1/2}$. We also derive a new upper bound for the performance of the empirically optimal quantizer.

Suggested Citation

  • Peter Bartlett & Tamas Linder & Gábor Lugosi, 1997. "The minimax distortion redundancy in empirical quantizer design," Economics Working Papers 198, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.
  • Handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:198
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://econ-papers.upf.edu/papers/198.pdf
    File Function: Whole Paper
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Benoît Cadre & Quentin Paris, 2012. "On Hölder fields clustering," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 21(2), pages 301-316, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Estimation; hypothesis testing; statistical decision theory: operations research;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C13 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Estimation: General
    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:upf:upfgen:198. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.econ.upf.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.