IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unl/unlfep/wp499.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Perceptions of authentizotic climates and employee happiness: pathways to individual performance?

Author

Listed:
  • Armenio Rego
  • Miguel Pina e Cunha

Abstract

We discuss how six dimensions of the authentizotic psychological climate explain stress and affective well-being at work, and how stress and affective well-being explain self-reported individual performance. The sample comprises 199 employees from 118 organizations. The findings indicate the good psychometric properties of the authentizotic climate measure, and suggest that (a) affective well-being, mainly enthusiasm and vigor, explain unique variance of selfreported performance and (b) the perceptions of authentizotic climates explain unique variance of stress, affective well-being and self-reported performance. A configurational approach is also presented for dealing with the ways people combine their perceptions of authentizotic climates, emotional states, stress and self-reported performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Armenio Rego & Miguel Pina e Cunha, 2006. "Perceptions of authentizotic climates and employee happiness: pathways to individual performance?," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp499, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp499
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/88444/1/WP499.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Miguel Pina e Cunha & Carlos Cabral Cardoso & Armenio Rego & Stewart Clegg, 2007. "From “This job is killing me” to “I live in the life I love and I love the life I live”, or from Stakhanov to contemporary workaholics," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp519, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Susana Lopes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feunlpt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.