IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/unl/unlfep/wp450.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

What are the limits of european expansion? The secession clause and why it matters

Author

Listed:
  • Leonor Rossi

Abstract

During the last days of the year 2003 twenty-five European countries failed to come to terms with all demands enclosed within the project of a Constitution for Europe. Everyone went home. Now nothing is agreed upon before all is agreed upon, and hopes are high that the Irish Presidency will manage to bring about a satisfactory covenant sometime in the Spring. In the meantime, a secession clause has crept into the agenda for Europe quietly. Article 59 of the upcoming Constitution allows any Member State, and thus all Member States, to leave the Treaty at will and in the process, entitles them to a bilateral agreement that clarifies the terms of such a procedure. The Treaties of Amsterdam and Nice had addressed the issue of suspension of a Member States voting rights but halted at the threshold of secession. Their unwillingness to go further had made it very clear to Member States that agreement and compromise was the only answer allowed when European issues were at stake. After the Constitution a Member State may distance itself not only from single issues under discussion but from European affairs altogether. It may later repent and appeal to article 57 to re-join the Union. Frontiers are thus rendered temporary. All European frontiers, old and new are rendered temporary. The external border is no longer fated to expand only, it may retreat, and the old and forgotten internal borders may be resurrected.

Suggested Citation

  • Leonor Rossi, 2004. "What are the limits of european expansion? The secession clause and why it matters," Nova SBE Working Paper Series wp450, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Nova School of Business and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp450
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/83480/1/WP450.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert A. Jones, 2001. "The Politics and Economics of the European Union, Second Edition," Books, Edward Elgar Publishing, number 1801.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David Bailey & Lisa De Propris, 2004. "A Bridge Too Phare? EU Pre‐Accession Aid and Capacity‐Building in the Candidate Countries," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(1), pages 77-98, February.
    2. McCann, Gerard, 2020. "The rise and fall of associationism: The Yaoundé and Lomé conventions," Studia z Polityki Publicznej / Public Policy Studies, Warsaw School of Economics, vol. 7(3), pages 1-21, October.
    3. Ahmed L.M. Ahmed, 2018. "The Social Background Of Brexit," Copernican Journal of Finance & Accounting, Uniwersytet Mikolaja Kopernika, vol. 7(4), pages 9-29.
    4. Andrea Gideon, 2015. "The Position of Higher Education Institutions in a Changing European Context: An EU Law Perspective," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 53(5), pages 1045-1060, September.
    5. Wolfram Lamping & Monika Steffen, 2009. "European Union and Health Policy: The “Chaordic” Dynamics of Integration," Social Science Quarterly, Southwestern Social Science Association, vol. 90(5), pages 1361-1379, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:unl:unlfep:wp450. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Susana Lopes (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/feunlpt.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.