IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ulb/ulbeco/2013-267685.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

End-of-life management of computers in Brussels: environmental comparison of two treatment chains

Author

Listed:
  • Louise Gonda
  • Marc Degrez

Abstract

Driven by environmental concerns and new legal requirements, the targeted collection rates of waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE) are increasing and waste operators seek to expand their collection. In this research, we compare the environmental impacts of two existing end-of-life treatment chains of computers in Brussels based on a life cycle assessment. The first chain is managed by the association responsible for complying to the take-back obligation on behalf of manufacturers in Belgium. The second one is run by work integration social enterprises (WISE) which prioritize reuse and a deeper manual dismantling of WEEE prior to mechanical treatment. The results show that the latter chain provides an environmental advantage up to 69% in comparison to the former thanks to reuse and a higher material recovery rate. Thus, if the first chain increases its collection in detriment of WISE, the global environmental benefits of the treatment of WEEE will decrease.

Suggested Citation

  • Louise Gonda & Marc Degrez, 2018. "End-of-life management of computers in Brussels: environmental comparison of two treatment chains," ULB Institutional Repository 2013/267685, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    • Handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/267685
    Note: SCOPUS: cp.p
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/267685/6/doi_251312.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ulb:ulbeco:2013/267685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ecsulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.