A study on factors contributing to the effectiveness of SME public financing measures

Research on SME public policies has greatly evolved during the past years. This is the case particularly in developed countries, where many institutions have been put in place to support these firms owing notably to their social and economic importance. Yet, the scientific community acknowledges that we still have substantial knowledge gaps with regards to the question of how and when governments should intervene to assist SMEs, and which specific categories of SMEs should receive assistance in some shape or form. The objective of this thesis is to bring an element of response to the above-mentioned question concerning public financing measures in particular. More precisely, its objective is to show how the type of measures used by governments and the internal characteristics of beneficiary firms contribute to make government intervention more or less effective in the short term (over a one-year interval) notably in terms of job creation. The interest of this thesis thus lies in the fact that it highlights new parameters which can be used in the framework of strategies aiming at improving the results of government intervention in the SME sector. The measures we examine include research and development subsidies, capital interventions, and loans. The characteristics of firms we consider include the level of cash-flow, the level of equity, and the level of financial debt. To achieve our objective, we focus on the context of the Brussels-capital Region in Belgium and consider 2004-2010 as the period of study. The thesis is principally inspired by Storey’s propositions (one of the pioneers of research on entrepreneurship and public policies), who posits that setting effective SME policies requires an understanding of factors influencing the birth, the growth, and the death of the latter. It uses the comparative and longitudinal approaches in a quasi-experimental research design with the relative difference-in-differences estimation and panel-data regression including dummy variables as techniques of analysis. The thesis is presented in five chapters. The first is devoted to the general introduction, in which we delineate the framework of the study. The second reviews the literature on the foundations and evaluation methods of SME policies. It gives the state of the art of current research on the topic addressed and defines the background of the thesis. The third chapter describes the methodology used to answer the research question. The fourth chapter is devoted to the results, which are presented through two empirical studies. The first empirical study analyzes the influence of the type of measures. It reveals that subsidies are on average more effective than the two other forms of financing followed respectively by loans, and capital interventions. The second empirical study analyzes the simultaneous influence of the type of measures and the characteristics of beneficiary firms. It shows that public measures are in general more effective in categories of firms having a relatively-high level of cash-flow, a relatively-high level of equity, or a relatively-low level of debt than in the other categories of firms. This result means that a high level of cash-flow as a high level of equity and a low level of debt have a positive effect on the expected outcomes of government intervention in the SME sector. Finally, chapter 5 presents the general conclusion. In this chapter, we summarize the main points developed; present the limitations of the thesis and the perspectives for future research.