IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucn/oapubs/10197-278.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Visits to primary care physicians and to specialists under gatekeeper and point-of-service arrangements

Author

Listed:
  • Kanika Kapur
  • Geoffrey F. Joyce
  • José J. Escarce
  • Krista A. Van Vorst

Abstract

Objective: To assess utilization of ambulatory visits to primary care physicians (PCPs) and to specialists in 2 different managed care models: a closed panel gatekeeper health maintenance organization (HMO) and an open panel point-of-service HMO. Study Design: Retrospective study of patients enrolled in a single managed care organization with 2 distinct product lines: a gatekeeper HMO and a point-of-service HMO. Both plans shared the same physician network. Patients and Methods: The study sample included 16,192 working-age members of the gatekeeper HMO and 36,819 working-age members of the point-of-service HMO. We estimated the number of PCP and specialist visits using negative binomial regression models and predicted the number of visits per year for each person under each HMO type and copayment option. Results: There were more annual visits to PCPs and a greater number of total physician visits in the gatekeeper HMO than in the point-of-service plan. However, we did not observe higher rates of specialist visits in the point-of-service HMO. Conclusion: We found no evidence that direct patient access to specialists leads to higher rates of specialty visits in plans with modest cost-sharing arrangements.

Suggested Citation

  • Kanika Kapur & Geoffrey F. Joyce & José J. Escarce & Krista A. Van Vorst, 2000. "Visits to primary care physicians and to specialists under gatekeeper and point-of-service arrangements," Open Access publications 10197/278, School of Economics, University College Dublin.
  • Handle: RePEc:ucn:oapubs:10197/278
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10197/278
    File Function: Open Access version, 2000
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew L. Maciejewski & Chuan‐Fen Liu & Andrew L. Kavee & Maren K. Olsen, 2012. "How Price Responsive Is The Demand For Specialty Care?," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 21(8), pages 902-912, August.
    2. Tetsuji Yamada & Chia-Ching Chen & Chiyoe Murata & Hiroshi Hirai & Toshiyuki Ojima & Katsunori Kondo & Joseph R. Harris III, 2015. "Access Disparity and Health Inequality of the Elderly: Unmet Needs and Delayed Healthcare," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-28, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucn:oapubs:10197/278. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nicolas Clifton (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/educdie.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.