IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucb/calbwp/92-206.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nonparametric Methods to Measure Efficiency: A Comparison of Methods

Author

Listed:
  • Richard F. Garbaccio, Benjamin E. Hermalin, Nancy E. Wallace.

Abstract

Using data on 951 savings and loans, we compare two nonparametric methods for measuring efficiency: Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and algebraic methods based on Varian (1984). We show that both methods are vulnerable to measurement error, although both theoretically and empirically we find the Varian-style measures to be less vulnerable. We also suggest simple methods to identify problematic observations and to reduce their influence on the results. Because we have data on the future insolvency of our savings and loans, we can directly compare the two methods by seeing which does a better job of predicting insolvency (working under the hypothesis that efficiency and insolvency should be negatively correlated). We find that the Varian-style methods do better; moreover, we find that some of the DEA measures yield the implausible result that efficiency and insolvency are positively correlated.

Suggested Citation

  • Richard F. Garbaccio, Benjamin E. Hermalin, Nancy E. Wallace., 1992. "Nonparametric Methods to Measure Efficiency: A Comparison of Methods," Economics Working Papers 92-206, University of California at Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucb:calbwp:92-206
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucb:calbwp:92-206. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debrkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.