IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ucb/calbrf/rpf-239.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Gains from Diversifying into Real Estate: Three Decades of Portfolio Returns Based on the Dynamic Investment Model

Author

Listed:
  • Robert R. Grauer and Nils H. Hakansson.

Abstract

This paper compares the investment policies and returns for portfolios of stocks and bonds with and without up to three categories of real estate. Both a domestic and a global setting are examined, with and without the possibility of leverage. The portfolios were generated via the dynamic investment model on the basis of the empirical probability assessment approach applied to past (joint) realizations of returns, both with and without correction for smoothing in the real estate data series. Our principal findings are: 1) the gains from adding real estate on a semi-passive (equal-weighted) basis to portfolios of either U.S. or global financial assets were relatively modest; in contrast, 2) the gains from adding real estate to the universe of U.S. financial assets under an active strategy were rather large (in some cases highly statistically significant), especially for the very risk-averse strategies; 3) the gains from adding (U.S.) real estate to a universe of global financial assets under an active strategy were mixed, although generally favorable for the highly risk- averse strategies; 4) correcting for second-moment smoothing in the real estate returns series had a relatively small impact for the more risk-tolerant strategies; and 5) there was some evidence that de-smoothing resulted in improved probability estimates.

Suggested Citation

  • Robert R. Grauer and Nils H. Hakansson., 1994. "Gains from Diversifying into Real Estate: Three Decades of Portfolio Returns Based on the Dynamic Investment Model," Research Program in Finance Working Papers RPF-239, University of California at Berkeley.
    • Handle: RePEc:ucb:calbrf:rpf-239
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucb:calbrf:rpf-239. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/debrkus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.