Author
Abstract
Canada’s population has been aging steadily for several decades. In 1976, the median age of men in the population was only 27.2 years, but by 2013, had risen to 39.4 years. The trend reflects both an increase in the life expectancy of Canadians at birth and also the impact of the aging baby boom generation. While youth have historically experienced higher unemployment rates than older workers, the post-recession reality of a workforce still dominated by the baby boom generation – some of whom have delayed retirement due to uncertain economic conditions left behind from the most recent recession – has created concern that older workers are filling jobs that would otherwise have been held by youth. Whereas some countries have attempted to address this concern with policy initiatives providing older workers with incentives to retire early (such as the Job Release Scheme (JRS) of the 1970s and 80s in the United Kingdom), such policy proposals are often criticized as lacking a theoretical foundation – given the fact that older workers and youth are generally not perfect substitutes for one another. A study entitled “Workforce Aging and the Labour Market Opportunities of Youth: Evidence from Canada†(CLSRN Working Paper no. 139) by CLSRN affiliates Sundip Dhanjal and Tammy Schirle (both of Wilfrid Laurier University) estimates the effect of workforce aging on youth unemployment, employment, wages and school enrolment. The study finds no evidence to suggest youth labour market outcomes would improve if fewer older individuals were active in the labour market – and instead find some evidence that an aging workforce could have positive implications for young workers. While high school shootings make up a relatively small percentage of teenage murders, their negative impact on student psyche can be lasting and damaging. Extremely violent incidents could be a distraction from learning, and fear and the perception of an unsafe learning environment could impede students from being open to new opportunities that are essential to learning and, even more problematically, students may avoid attending school. Violent incidents can affect the allocation of teaching time. These factors could influence students’ cognitive performance and behavioral outcomes. Apart from the emotional and psychological trauma inflicted by school shootings, what impacts do these events have on academic performance of students who survive these events and return to school? A CLSRN study entitled “The Effect of High School Shootings on Schools and Student Performance†(CLSRN Working Paper no. 136) by Louis-Philippe Beland (Louisiana State University) and Dongwoo Kim (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) find that school shootings significantly decrease the enrollment of students in grade 9 (high-school entrance grade), and test scores in Math and English
Suggested Citation
Tran, Vivian, 2014.
"Labour Market Matters - August 2014,"
CLSSRN working papers
clsrn_admin-2014-38, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 28 Aug 2014.
Handle:
RePEc:ubc:clssrn:clsrn_admin-2014-38
Download full text from publisher
More about this item
Keywords
Population aging;
Employment;
Unemployment;
Youth;
Shootings;
Student performance;
Education;
All these keywords.
JEL classification:
- J11 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Demographic Trends, Macroeconomic Effects, and Forecasts
- J21 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Labor Force and Employment, Size, and Structure
- I29 - Health, Education, and Welfare - - Education - - - Other
- J13 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demographic Economics - - - Fertility; Family Planning; Child Care; Children; Youth
- K4 - Law and Economics - - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior
NEP fields
This paper has been announced in the following
NEP Reports:
Statistics
Access and download statistics
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ubc:clssrn:clsrn_admin-2014-38. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vivian Tran (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.clsrn.econ.ubc.ca/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.