Author
Abstract
When the Dow Jones stock index hit an all-time high on March 5, 2013, some commentators said that this surge in share prices indicated a breaking of the psychological barrier faced by markets since the Great Recession. But others noted just how volatile financial markets have been – the Dow Jones index fell by half during 2008-2009, before starting its recent upward run. What happens on Wall Street, does not necessarily reflect what is happening on Main Street, and a study entitled “Increasing Inequality is Unbalanced Growth: Evidence from North America†(CLSRN Working Paper no. 102) by CLSRN affiliate Lars Osberg (Dalhousie University) may have an explanation. Since the 1980s, in both Canada and the U.S., the rising share of the top 1% has been driven by the fact that their incomes have grown strongly, but the real incomes of most other people have stagnated. Osberg argues that when income growth rates are unbalanced, one instability leads to another. Unbalanced growth in incomes means that financial assets are accumulated at the top of the income distribution while liabilities accumulate at the bottom – but rising household debts and stagnant incomes for the middle class produce a financial house of cards. When the inevitable crisis occurs, rising unemployment then swells government deficits, creating new instabilities of public debt. A poll published by the National Post in 2012 found that more than three-quarters of Canadians think that Canada suffers from an income gap where the rich are getting too rich and the poor are getting too poor. In a paper entitled “Top Income Shares in Canada: Recent Trends and Policy Implications†(CLSRN Working Paper no. 103), CLSRN affiliate Michael R. Veall (McMaster University) confirms that the gap is growing. He finds that between 1986 and 2009, the average real income of the top 0.01% of all taxfilers in Canada increased by about 150%, in contrast to an increase of only 19% for those in the bottom nine-tenths of the income distribution. Without being able to pinpoint the exact cause of the income surge, but still faced with clear evidence of growing income inequality in Canada, Veall outlines three policy priorities aimed to increase overall economic efficiency to benefit all Canadians.
Suggested Citation
Tran, Vivian, 2013.
"Labour Market Matters - March 2013,"
CLSSRN working papers
clsrn_admin-2013-13, Vancouver School of Economics, revised 20 Mar 2013.
Handle:
RePEc:ubc:clssrn:clsrn_admin-2013-13
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ubc:clssrn:clsrn_admin-2013-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Vivian Tran (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.clsrn.econ.ubc.ca/ .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.