Author
Abstract
Costa Rica allocates 20% of its GDP to finance a broad range of social programs. Social spending is funded primarily through indirect taxes, as well as through specific social security contributions. Using market income as a reference, only direct taxes turn out to be clearly progressive, as opposed to indirect taxes and specific contributions to the social security system, which tend to be rather neutral in relative terms. Nonetheless, most social programs are progressive, in fact some of them are very progressive-especially cash transfers, which are highly focalized– resulting in reductions in poverty and, principally, inequality. The study highlights the enormous significance of increasing amount and progressiveness in the country’s taxes, to give sustainability to the social public expenditure as well as strengthening certain focalized programs with a great impact on the poorest. Resumen. Costa Rica destina el equivalente 20% de su PIB al financiamiento de una amplia gama de programas sociales públicos. Ese gasto social se financia principalmente con impuestos indirectos así como con las contribuciones específicas para la seguridad social. Cuando se considera el ingreso de mercado como referencia, solamente los impuestos directos resultan claramente progresivos, no así los impuestos indirectos ni las contribuciones a la seguridad social, que tienden a ser más neutrales en términos relativos. No obstante, la mayor parte de los programas sociales son progresivos, y algunos de ellos muy progresivos especialmente los de transferencias monetarias, que son altamente focalizados-, lo cual resulta en reducciones en la pobreza y, principalmente, la desigualdad. El estudio realizado hace evidente la enorme importancia de aumentar la magnitud y progresividad de los tributos, para darle sostenibilidad al gasto público social, así como fortalecer algunos programas focalizados que tienen un elevado impacto sobre los más pobres.
Suggested Citation
Pablo Sauma & Juan Diego Trejos, 2014.
"Universidad de Costa Rica,"
Commitment to Equity (CEQ) Working Paper Series
18S, Tulane University, Department of Economics.
Handle:
RePEc:tul:ceqwps:18s
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tul:ceqwps:18s. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Nora Lustig (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/detulus.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.