IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tse/wpaper/30137.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Le Scrutin Binominal Paritaire : Un Regard d'Ingénierie Electorale

Author

Listed:
  • Le Breton, Michel
  • Lepelley, Dominique
  • Merlin, Vincent
  • Sauger, Nicolas

Abstract

A partir du cas du changement du mode d'élection des conseillers départementaux français, cet article propose un cadre analytique d'évaluation des réformes de système électoral. Dans une perspective d'ingénierie électorale, quatre indices principaux sont utilisés, notamment les indices de dismajorité et de disproportionnalité. On montre ainsi que l'exigence de parité entre hommes et femmes introduite par le scrutin binominal paritaire a pu être réalisée aux dépens d'autres qualités attendues d'un système électoral. L'analyse systématique de ces arbitrages forme le coeur de cet article, avec une première application à notre cas d'étude.

Suggested Citation

  • Le Breton, Michel & Lepelley, Dominique & Merlin, Vincent & Sauger, Nicolas, 2016. "Le Scrutin Binominal Paritaire : Un Regard d'Ingénierie Electorale," TSE Working Papers 16-621, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Jan 2017.
    • Handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:30137
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/wp/2016/wp_tse_621.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. de Mouzon, Olivier & Laurent, Thibault & Le Breton, Michel & Moyouwou, Issofa, 2020. "“One Man, One Vote” Part 1: Electoral Justice in the U.S. Electoral College: Banzhaf and Shapley/Shubik versus May," TSE Working Papers 20-1074, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE).
    2. Dominique Lepelley, 2021. "Remarques sur le mode d'élection des conseillers départementaux," Post-Print hal-03546568, HAL.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:30137. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tsetofr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.