IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tse/wpaper/30136.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Egalitarian Value for Cooperative Games with Incomplete Information

Author

Listed:
  • Salamanca Lugo, Andrés

Abstract

A bargaining solution concept generalizing the Harsanyi NTU value is defined for cooperative games with incomplete information. Our definition of a cooperative solution implies that all coalitional threats are equitable when players make interpersonal utility comparisons in terms of some virtual utility scales. In contrast, Myerson’s (1984b) generalization of the Shapley NTU value is only equitable for the grand coalition. When there are only two players, the two solutions are easily seen to coincide, however they may differ for general n-person games. By using the concept of virtual utility, our bargaining solution reflects the fact that players negotiate at the interim stage.

Suggested Citation

  • Salamanca Lugo, Andrés, 2016. "An Egalitarian Value for Cooperative Games with Incomplete Information," TSE Working Papers 16-620, Toulouse School of Economics (TSE), revised Apr 2017.
  • Handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:30136
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/wp/2016/wp_tse_620.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/wp/2016/appendix_a.pdf
    File Function: Appendixe A
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.tse-fr.eu/sites/default/files/TSE/documents/doc/wp/2016/appendix_b.pdf
    File Function: Appendixe B
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Cooperative games; incomplete information; virtual utility;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C71 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Cooperative Games
    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tse:wpaper:30136. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tsetofr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.