IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tiu/tiutis/0651c9b8-01ec-451a-aced-22d227d45927.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

On the unbiasedness of iterated GLS estimators

Author

Listed:
  • Don, F.J.H.
  • Magnus, J.R.

    (Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management)

Abstract

In 1967 Kakwani showed that any estimator which has a sampling error of the form H(06 is unbiased, provided that the estimator has a finite expectation, H is even, and E symmetrically distributed about zero. Fuller and Battese (1973) used this result to establish unbiasedness of the GLS estimator in a variance components model, and Mehta and Swamy (1976) did the same for a variant of Zellner's two-step estimator under normality. In this paper we prove that Kakwani's result is applicable to the iterated GLS estimators at each step of the iteration, and conditions for the finiteness of the expectations are derived, implying unbiasedness of the iterated GLS estimators under certain stated conditions. Assuming normal disturbances, unbiasedness of the maximum likelihood estimator is proved under assumptions earlier made by Oberhofer and Kmenta (1974) to guarantee convergence of the iteration procedure to the solution of the ML-equations.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Don, F.J.H. & Magnus, J.R., 1980. "On the unbiasedness of iterated GLS estimators," Other publications TiSEM 0651c9b8-01ec-451a-aced-2, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    • Handle: RePEc:tiu:tiutis:0651c9b8-01ec-451a-aced-22d227d45927
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://pure.uvt.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/649669/26950_6620.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Vasnev, Andrey L., 2010. "Sensitivity of GLS estimators in random effects models," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 101(5), pages 1252-1262, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tiu:tiutis:0651c9b8-01ec-451a-aced-22d227d45927. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Richard Broekman (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/about/schools/economics-and-management/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.