IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/tin/wpaper/20000050.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Inherent Reward and Risk (Part I): Towards a Universal Paradigm for Investment Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Zou

    (University of Amsterdam)

Abstract

In this paper, a new paradigm is developed for analyzinginvestment strategies and pricing financial assets. This paradigmassumes that any investment strategy has its own “inherent reward”and “inherent risk” that can be judged with common sense. Ijustify axiomatically the existence and uniqueness (ratio scale)of inherent reward (U) and inherent risk (D) that could beregarded as universal measures of reward and risk for any giveninvestment strategy. Incorporating the notion of “inherentefficiency” in a portfolio context, I show that the inherentreward-to-risk ratio (Z=U/D) is capable of ranking all theinvestment strategies with any return distributions, while beingconsistent with the fundamental principles of no-arbitrage andfirst-order stochastic dominance. If there exists an inherentlyefficient benchmark portfolio within any given set of feasiblestrategies, then the risk premium on any of these strategies mustsatisfy a simple relationship with the benchmark risk premium (theInherent CAPM). Sophisticated securities such as options orportfolios with imbedded options can then be priced without havingto assume that the market is complete or that the security pricefollows a specific process. Other issues discussed in the paperinclude prospect theory, the Allais paradox, the computation ofinherent reward and risk, the mean-variance CAPM, and performanceevaluation.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Zou, 2000. "Inherent Reward and Risk (Part I): Towards a Universal Paradigm for Investment Analysis," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 00-050/2, Tinbergen Institute.
  • Handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20000050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.tinbergen.nl/00050.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    inherent reward; inherent risk; inherent dominance; stochastic dominance; inherent efficiency;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tin:wpaper:20000050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tinbergen Office +31 (0)10-4088900 (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/tinbenl.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.