IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/stc/stcp3e/2016373e.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Industry Origins of Canada?s Weaker Labour Productivity Performance and the Role of Structural Adjustment in the 1990s and the 2000s

Author

Listed:
  • Willox, Michael
  • Baldwin, John R.

Abstract

This paper examines how much of the slowdown in productivity growth observed in Canada?s business sector between the 1990s (1990 to 1999) and the 2000s (2000 to 2014) was due to weaker productivity growth within industries and how much was due to structural adjustment. The analysis makes use of a decomposition method that differs from many of the standard labour productivity decomposition approaches commonly found in the literature and allows the contributions of changes in the importance of individual industries to be calculated.

Suggested Citation

  • Willox, Michael & Baldwin, John R., 2016. "The Industry Origins of Canada?s Weaker Labour Productivity Performance and the Role of Structural Adjustment in the 1990s and the 2000s," Analytical Studies Branch Research Paper Series 2016373e, Statistics Canada, Analytical Studies Branch.
  • Handle: RePEc:stc:stcp3e:2016373e
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/11F0019M2016373
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/en/catalogue/11F0019M2016373
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Matthew Calver and Alexander Murray, 2016. "Decomposing Multifactor Productivity Growth in Canada by Industry and Province, 1997-2014," CSLS Research Reports 2016-19, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.
    2. Alexander Murray, 2017. "What Explains the Post-2004 U.S.Productivity Slowdown?," CSLS Research Reports 2017-05, Centre for the Study of Living Standards.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Economic accounts; Productivity accounts;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:stc:stcp3e:2016373e. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Mark Brown (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/stagvca.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.