IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sol/wpaper/2013-389217.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Boomerang Effect of Negative Decoupling in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Management

Author

Listed:
  • Valérie De Cock
  • Pinar Celik
  • Colette Van Laar
  • Claudia Toma

Abstract

Existing research on the impact of organizational decoupling in the DEI domain mainly focuses on its effect on organizational perceptions and interpersonal outcomes. This article shifts focus to its impact on intrapersonal responses. Three quasi-experimental studies (Ntotal = 1233) tested the effects of negative decoupling (diversity talk present, diversity progress absent) against (a) positive congruence (both diversity talk and diversity progress present) and (b) a control condition (diversity talk only) on perceptions of dehumanization. For disadvantaged groups, negative decoupling increased perceptions of dehumanization, which in turn was related to lower levels of inclusion, organizational commitment, and person-organization fit. For advantaged groups, results were mixed, with Studies 1 and 2 showing adverse effects and Study 3 showing no significant impact. This article highlights the potentially harmful consequences of negative decoupling and raises questions about the factors behind its varied effects, especially on advantaged groups.

Suggested Citation

  • Valérie De Cock & Pinar Celik & Colette Van Laar & Claudia Toma, 2025. "The Boomerang Effect of Negative Decoupling in Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Management," Working Papers CEB 25-001, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/389217
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/389217/3/wp25001.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sol:wpaper:2013/389217. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cebulbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.