IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/raiswp/0230.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Texas’ Teens Face a Social Media Ban: A New Start or a Recipe for Destructive Isolation?

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel B. Kurz

    (Middlesex College, Edison, New Jersey, USA)

  • Spencer Jahng

    (The Pingry School, New Jersey, USA)

Abstract

The Texas State Legislature has been dominated by the Republican Party for over a decade, with solid majorities in both houses. This has enabled it to rapidly take ideas from the so-called ‘Conservative Public Sphere’ and enact them into genuine policy in very short periods of time. In other words, when prominent Texas Republicans think out loud, it is not very long until many of those thoughts become law. Just this June, the conservative Texas Public Policy Foundation called for a ‘Social Media Ban’ based on its own research. According to the Foundation, teens should be totally barred from using all platforms in this sphere until they are adults due to the immense harm they pose to young people. Within a few weeks, major Texas Republicans echoed this sentiment on social platforms like Twitter, with one, Representative James Patterson, going the furthest. He has pledged in the next session to introduce a bill aimed at shutting off social media access to all Texas teens in 2023. (Whiting 2022). In this short paper, we will try to consider what accounts for the enormous speed of radical policymaking. Do these aims go beyond mere protection and exceed the First Amendment rights of teens? How will such a ban be enforced? What are the potential complexities and impact of such a change on the lives of Texas teens?

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel B. Kurz & Spencer Jahng, 2022. "Texas’ Teens Face a Social Media Ban: A New Start or a Recipe for Destructive Isolation?," RAIS Conference Proceedings 2022-2024 0230, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0230
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/0230.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Adolescence; Internet; Grooming; First Amendment; Networking; Isolation; Mental Illness; Texas; Legislature; Legislation; Overreaction;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:raiswp:0230. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.