IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/opaper/23.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Patients motivation and health plan choice

Author

Listed:
  • DongWoo Ko

    (Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, South Korea)

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that Medicare beneficiaries tend not to switch their prescription drug plans even though they can largely save drug costs by plan switching. To explore why this so called “plan stickiness†happens, the present study focused on the concept of social exclusion, which is one of the most important characteristics of the elderly. This study compared the impact of two types of social exclusion on an association between psychological cost and plan switchingpassive social exclusion and active social exclusion. These two types are known to differently influence consumers’ motivation and decision-making process. The 2007 Prescription Drug Study supplement to the Health and Retirement Study data were used for analysis. We investigated the individual- level willingness to switch across multiple levels using a Hierarchical Linear Model. The findings suggest that passive social exclusion is associated with uncertainty cost. Study findings will help policymakers better understand the elderly’s plan decision- making process and promote their informed plan decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • DongWoo Ko, 2017. "Patients motivation and health plan choice," Working papers Conference proceedings The Future of Ethics, Education and Research, October 16-17, 2017 23, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:opaper:23
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/23.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Medicare; Beneficiaries Non-Switching Behavior; Psychological Cost; Hierarchical Linear Model.;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:opaper:23. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.