IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/smo/apaper/041cia.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Literary Fiction and Historical Reality – Documenting Centuries of Incriminated Occult Practices

Author

Listed:
  • Ioana Alexandra Curca

    (Dimitrie Cantemir Christian University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

The fifteenth century reflects the dawn of a canvas depicting a troublesome setting, inflicting vile retribution for actions that were feared and most often misinterpreted. Deeming witchcraft as an outrageous crime was a fact of existence, dictated by the influence of church and state intertwined and seen as a threat to the natural order. Rather than focusing on the fascination surrounding the practices associated with the occult, the main goal of the present paper is to provide an insight into the mechanism of past societies and how relevant literature and reality reach a convergence point on the matter of historical truth. Folklore and fantasy need to be overlooked in order to shed light on the accuracy of the entire phenomenon. The hysteria building around it and misconceptions related to esoteric pursuits led people to a distorted perception of those considered practitioners, thus sparking a long path of violence: empty, unfounded accusations and testimonies against humans with no privilege or way to defend themselves, implausible evidence of their actions, forced confessions and mass executions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ioana Alexandra Curca, 2020. "Literary Fiction and Historical Reality – Documenting Centuries of Incriminated Occult Practices," Proceedings of the 18th International RAIS Conference, August 17-18, 2020 041cia, Research Association for Interdisciplinary Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:smo:apaper:041cia
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://rais.education/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/041CIA.pdf
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    witchcraft; trials; indictment; misapprehension; facts;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:smo:apaper:041cia. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Eduard David (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://rais.education/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.