IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/sko/wpaper/bep-2021-07.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Religious Entrepreneurial Communities - Solution for or Cause of Socioeconomic Injustice? A Comment

Author

Listed:
  • Henrik Egbert

    (Anhalt University of Applied Sciences, Bernburg, Germany)

Abstract

Certain religious entrepreneurial minded communities are highly successful. It is tempting to assume that the underlying social mechanism of business success can be used as a blueprint for the development of larger social entities. Recently, Javaid, Shamsi and Hyder (2020) have argued that inefficiencies of markets and bureaucracies may be avoided if religious entrepreneurial communities are considered an alternative for membersÕ business investment, capital- and expertise-support to businesses, and the redistribution of wealth in favor of economically vulnerable community members. Consequently, the title of their paper is ÒReligious entrepreneurial communities as a solution for socioeconomic injusticeÓ. I address this problematic position by an extended comment and point out inefficiencies induced by such an approach. I apply the concepts of networks and clubs to tackle problems of religious entrepreneurial communities as sub-groups of larger social entities. Individual beliefs, individual preferences, and norms of cooperative behavior can occur among members of any community, with or without common religious beliefs. Consequently, a shift from the areligious, market-oriented form of economic organization towards specific sets of religious beliefs will not, by itself, endanger business success. These issues require considerable attention before a transfer of behavioral pattern prevalent in small communities can be applied to larger groups. I emphasize the danger of generalizations from small case study results of specific entrepreneurial communities to larger social entities, such as societies.

Suggested Citation

  • Henrik Egbert, 2021. "Religious Entrepreneurial Communities - Solution for or Cause of Socioeconomic Injustice? A Comment," Bulgarian Economic Papers bep-2021-07, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski - Bulgaria // Center for Economic Theories and Policies at Sofia University St Kliment Ohridski, revised Aug 2021.
  • Handle: RePEc:sko:wpaper:bep-2021-07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.uni-sofia.bg/index.php/eng/content/download/255382/1681443/file/BEP-2021-07.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2021
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. S. Brammer & Geoffrey Williams & John Zinkin, 2007. "Religion and Attitudes to Corporate Social Responsibility in a Large Cross-Country Sample," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 229-243, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sapanna Laysiriroj & Walter Wehrmeyer, 2020. "Intergenerational differences of CSR activities in family-run businesses in eastern Thailand," Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 1-15, December.
    2. Leventis, Stergios & Hasan, Iftekhar & Dedoulis, Emmanouil, 2013. "The cost of sin: The effect of social norms on audit pricing," Bank of Finland Research Discussion Papers 13/2013, Bank of Finland.
    3. Ziyu Chen & Shouming Chen & Talib Hussain, 2019. "The Perception of Corporate Social Responsibility in Muslim Society: A Survey in Pakistan and Sudan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-16, November.
    4. R. Casselman & Linda Sama & Abraham Stefanidis, 2015. "Differential Social Performance of Religiously-Affiliated Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) in Base of Pyramid (BoP) Markets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(3), pages 539-552, December.
    5. repec:zbw:bofrdp:2013_013 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Silvana Secinaro & Maha Radwan & Davide Calandra & Paolo Biancone, 2021. "Halal certification impact on firms' corporate social responsibility disclosure: Evidence from the food & beverage sector in Italy," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(4), pages 1376-1385, July.
    7. Hunjra, Ahmed Imran & Boubaker, Sabri & Arunachalam, Murugesh & Mehmood, Asad, 2021. "How does CSR mediate the relationship between culture, religiosity and firm performance?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    8. Sergio Vergalli & Laura Poddi, 2009. "Does Corporate Social Responsibility Affect the Performance of Firms?," Working Papers 2009.52, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    9. Paolo Cominetti & Laura Poddi & Sergio Vergalli, 2013. "The Push Factors for Corporate Social Responsibility: A Probit Analysis," Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, ScientificPapers.org, vol. 3(2), pages 1-2, April.
    10. Belal A. Kaifi & Nile M. Khanfar & Ahmad O. Noor & Laura Poluka, 2014. "International Business Students¡¯ Understanding, Perception, and Commitment to Corporate Social Responsibility: A Study Based Upon Gender, Generational Affiliation, and Culture," Business and Management Research, Business and Management Research, Sciedu Press, vol. 3(3), pages 34-42, September.
    11. Bo Xu & Linlin Ma, 2022. "Religious Values Motivating CSR: An Empirical Study from Corporate Leaders’ Perspective," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 176(3), pages 487-505, March.
    12. Geoffrey Williams & John Zinkin, 2010. "Islam and CSR: A Study of the Compatibility Between the Tenets of Islam and the UN Global Compact," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 519-533, February.
    13. Céline Louche & Daniel Arenas & Katinka Cranenburgh, 2012. "From Preaching to Investing: Attitudes of Religious Organisations Towards Responsible Investment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 110(3), pages 301-320, October.
    14. Blanca Pérez-Gladish & Karen Benson & Robert Faff, 2012. "Profiling socially responsible investors: Australian evidence," Australian Journal of Management, Australian School of Business, vol. 37(2), pages 189-209, August.
    15. Maria Anne Schmidt & Daniel Cracau, 2015. "Cross-Country Comparison of the Corporate Social Responsibility Orientation in Germany and Qatar: An Empirical Study among Business Students," FEMM Working Papers 150006, Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, Faculty of Economics and Management.
    16. Michael Minkov & Geert Hofstede, 2014. "Nations Versus Religions: Which Has a Stronger Effect on Societal Values?," Management International Review, Springer, vol. 54(6), pages 801-824, December.
    17. Fara Azmat & Ramanie Samaratunge & Ahmed Ferdous, 2021. "Consumer well‐being and social responsibility of subsistence entrepreneurs in subsistence marketplace," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 55(1), pages 8-30, March.
    18. Hussey, Andrew, 2011. "The effect of ethics on labor market success: Evidence from MBAs," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 80(1), pages 168-180.
    19. Ferdinand A. Gul & Anthony C. Ng, 2018. "Auditee Religiosity, External Monitoring, and the Pricing of Audit Services," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 152(2), pages 409-436, October.
    20. Muhammad Osama Mirza, 2016. "Employer-Employee Relationships in Islam: A Normative View from the Perspective of Orthodox Islamic Scholars," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(4), pages 1-59, March.
    21. Leventis, Stergios & Hasan, Iftekhar & Dedoulis, Emmanouil, 2013. "The cost of sin: The effect of social norms on audit pricing," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 152-165.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    entrepreneurial communities; socioeconomic justice; community-based entrepreneurship; entrepreneurship-based policy; clubs; networks;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D71 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Social Choice; Clubs; Committees; Associations
    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation
    • P42 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Other Economic Systems - - - Productive Enterprises; Factor and Product Markets; Prices
    • Z12 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Religion

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sko:wpaper:bep-2021-07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Prof. Teodor Sedlarski (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/fesofbg.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.